Razer has a vertical mouse now

Engadget - Apr 24th, 2025

Razer has introduced two new models in its Pro Click mouse series, focusing on ergonomic comfort and extended use. The Pro Click V2 is a standard mouse model, while the Pro Click V2 Vertical Edition marks Razer's entry into vertical mouse designs. The Vertical Edition, priced at $120, features a 71.7-degree tilt for a handshake-like grip and includes eight programmable buttons, boasting a battery life of up to six months. It is designed to reduce wrist strain and friction, catering to users who spend long hours at their computers. Meanwhile, the standard Pro Click V2, at $100, offers a slight 30-degree angle with an additional ninth button and a shorter battery life of 3.5 months. Both models feature Razer's signature RGB lighting, appealing to users who enjoy a visually dynamic setup.

The introduction of these mice reflects a growing trend among peripheral manufacturers towards ergonomic designs, catering to the increasing number of users seeking comfort during extended computer use. The Pro Click V2 Vertical Edition, in particular, highlights Razer's commitment to innovation by entering the vertical mouse market, offering a competitive alternative for users with specific ergonomic needs. The significance of this launch lies in its potential to influence other manufacturers to prioritize ergonomics in their product designs, possibly setting a new standard for computer peripherals, especially as remote work and prolonged computer usage become more common globally.

Rgb Lighting Razer Pro Click V2 Vertical Mouse Ergonomics Computer Peripherals

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely overview of Razer's new Pro Click V2 models, highlighting their ergonomic features and pricing. It effectively communicates the potential benefits of these products to consumers interested in ergonomic solutions. However, the article lacks transparency and source attribution, which affects its credibility. Additionally, it could benefit from a more balanced presentation that includes potential drawbacks or criticisms. Despite these limitations, the article is well-written and accessible, making it a useful resource for readers interested in the latest tech products from Razer.

Accuracy

The story accurately describes Razer's introduction of the Pro Click V2 and the Pro Click V2 Vertical Edition, including their ergonomic features and pricing. The claim about the Pro Click V2 Vertical Edition being Razer's first vertical mouse design is precise. However, the battery life claims (six months for the Vertical Edition and 3.5 months for the standard model) require verification through Razer's specifications or user reviews to confirm accuracy. Additionally, the number of programmable buttons (eight for the Vertical Edition and nine for the standard) should be validated through official sources.

Balance

The article provides a balanced overview of the new Razer products by discussing both models' features and potential ergonomic benefits. It does not show favoritism towards one model over the other. However, the article could have included perspectives from users or experts on ergonomic mice to provide a more comprehensive view. Additionally, the article lacks a discussion on potential drawbacks or criticisms of the products, which would contribute to a more balanced presentation.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and concise, with a straightforward presentation of the new Razer products' features and pricing. It uses accessible language and maintains a neutral tone throughout. However, the structure could be improved by organizing the information more logically, perhaps by grouping similar features together or providing a summary section to consolidate the key points.

Source quality

The article does not cite any sources directly, which affects its credibility. It appears to rely on information likely obtained from Razer's press releases or official site, but without explicit attribution, it's challenging to assess the reliability fully. Including direct quotes from Razer representatives or experts in ergonomic design would enhance the article's authority and trustworthiness.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency regarding its sources and methodology. It does not disclose how the information was obtained or whether it consulted any external sources or experts. This lack of context makes it difficult for readers to assess the basis of the claims. The article would benefit from clarifying its sources and any potential conflicts of interest that might affect the impartiality of the reporting.