Rare Frog Thought To Be Extinct Rediscovered After A 130-Year-Long Search — A Biologist Explains

Forbes - Mar 31st, 2025

In a groundbreaking scientific achievement, the elusive amphibian Alsodes vittatus has been rediscovered in the remote foothills of the Chilean Andes after being absent from scientific records for over 130 years. The discovery was made by a team from the University of Concepción, who meticulously retraced historical accounts and conducted methodical field surveys. Two populations of this rare species were located in the Lolco and Portales river basins, renewing hope for its survival and prompting a reevaluation of its conservation status.

The rediscovery of Alsodes vittatus is significant not only for its historical and scientific value but also for its implications on biodiversity conservation. This development underscores the importance of historical records in modern conservation efforts and highlights the challenges posed by environmental changes and habitat alterations. It emphasizes the legacy of early naturalists like Rodulfo Amando Philippi, whose foundational work continues to inform contemporary research. The finding serves as a reminder of the rich yet fragile biodiversity of South America and the ongoing need for protective measures to preserve it.

Alsodes Vittatus University Of Concepción Rodulfo Amando Philippi Philibert Germain Amphibian Rediscovery Biodiversity Conservation Chilean Andes

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

8.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively communicates the rediscovery of Alsodes vittatus, providing a well-rounded narrative that combines historical context with modern scientific efforts. Its strengths lie in its accuracy, clarity, and engagement, capturing the reader's interest with a compelling story. The article is timely and relevant, contributing to ongoing discussions about biodiversity and conservation. However, it could benefit from greater transparency in methodology and a deeper exploration of the implications for conservation policy. Overall, the article is a high-quality piece that successfully highlights the significance of rediscovering a species long thought extinct.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports the rediscovery of Alsodes vittatus after a 130-year absence from scientific records. It correctly attributes the efforts to a team from the Laboratory of Systematics and Conservation of Herpetozoa at the University of Concepción, Chile. The historical background about the species being first described by Rodulfo Amando Philippi based on specimens collected by Philibert Germain is precise. The article also accurately describes the challenges faced in rediscovering the species, including imprecise historical records and environmental changes. Overall, the factual claims in the article are well-supported by credible sources and align with documented research findings.

Balance

The story provides a balanced view by discussing both the historical context and the modern rediscovery efforts. It highlights the contributions of early naturalists and modern scientists, showing a continuity of scientific inquiry over time. However, the article could have included more perspectives on the implications of this rediscovery for conservation policy and biodiversity management. While it does mention the threats to the species and the need for conservation, it could have explored these aspects in greater depth to provide a more comprehensive view of the issue.

Clarity

The article is well-written, with a clear and engaging narrative that effectively communicates the story of Alsodes vittatus. The language is accessible and the structure logical, making it easy for readers to follow the historical context and modern rediscovery efforts. The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, focusing on the facts and significance of the rediscovery. Overall, it is clear and concise, with a compelling narrative that captures the reader's interest.

Source quality

The article is based on credible sources, including research from a reputable university and historical accounts from recognized naturalists. It references specific individuals and institutions involved in the rediscovery, which adds to its reliability. However, the article does not explicitly cite external sources or provide direct links to scientific studies or reports, which would enhance its credibility further. The reliance on expert opinion and historical records is appropriate for the topic, but more direct citations would strengthen the article's authority.

Transparency

The article provides a clear narrative of the rediscovery process, including the historical and modern efforts involved. It explains the challenges faced due to imprecise historical records and environmental changes. However, it lacks explicit disclosure of the methodologies used in the rediscovery and does not mention any potential conflicts of interest. Including more details about the research methods and any affiliations or funding sources would improve transparency.