President Trump signs continuing resolution, officially averting a shutdown

Fox News - Mar 15th, 2025

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., faced criticism from his Democratic peers after deciding to support a GOP-sponsored spending bill, which was also backed by President Donald Trump. The Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, known as H.R. 1968, was signed into law by President Trump after clearing both the House and Senate. This move prevented a looming government shutdown by extending the government’s budget through September. The bill saw support from a majority of Senate Republicans, with only Sen. Rand Paul, R-K.Y., dissenting. Schumer was joined by nine other Democrats in voting for the bill, including Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin and Sens. Angus King, Brian Schatz, and others.

The decision sparked a notable backlash within the Democratic Party, with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi voicing opposition to the bill, urging fellow Democrats to consider alternatives promoted by Rep. Rosa DeLauro and Sen. Patty Murray. This included a proposed four-week extension to foster a bipartisan funding agreement. Despite the internal discord, the passage of the bill was seen as a victory for Trump, who expressed his satisfaction with the Senate's decision. This development highlights the ongoing tensions within the Democratic Party and the strategic maneuvers of Republican leadership under Trump to avoid a government shutdown.

Donald Trump Democratic Party Republican Party Nancy Pelosi Government Shutdown Chuck Schumer Senate Vote H.R. 1968

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides an accurate and timely account of a significant political event, focusing on the passage of a continuing resolution to avert a government shutdown. It effectively outlines the key actions and reactions from political figures, particularly emphasizing the bipartisan nature of the decision. However, the article could benefit from a more balanced presentation of perspectives, particularly those opposing the bill, and greater transparency in sourcing and methodology. The language and structure are clear, making it accessible to a wide audience, though some details could be more thoroughly explained. Overall, the story is informative and relevant, contributing to public understanding of government operations and political dynamics.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports key events, such as the signing of H.R. 1968 by President Trump and the passage of the CR by both the House and Senate. The claim that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced backlash for supporting the bill is supported by other sources, confirming internal Democratic Party divisions. However, the story lacks verification for some specifics, such as Nancy Pelosi's statement urging senators to "listen to women," which is not corroborated by other sources. Overall, the factual claims are mostly accurate and verifiable, though some details require further confirmation.

Balance

The story presents multiple perspectives, including those of Republican and Democratic leaders, but it leans towards highlighting the Republican viewpoint, particularly the actions and reactions of President Trump. While it mentions Democratic dissent and backlash against Schumer, it does not provide a detailed exploration of the reasons behind the opposition. The focus on Schumer's decision and the Republican success in passing the bill could suggest a slight bias towards the GOP narrative, with less emphasis on the Democratic arguments against the bill.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and concise, with a logical flow of information. It effectively outlines the sequence of events leading to the signing of the CR and the reactions from various political figures. The language is straightforward, making the content accessible to a broad audience. However, some parts, such as the details of Pelosi's statement, could be more explicitly clarified to enhance understanding.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources such as Fox News panelists and includes references to public figures like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. However, it relies heavily on internal sources and lacks a diverse range of external or independent sources to corroborate the claims. The inclusion of quotes and statements from political leaders adds authority, but the absence of direct links or citations to external reports or data limits the breadth of source quality.

Transparency

The article provides some context for the events described, such as the potential government shutdown and the political implications of the CR. However, it lacks transparency regarding the methodology of gathering information and does not disclose potential conflicts of interest. The basis for claims, especially those related to Pelosi's statement and Democratic opposition, is not clearly explained, reducing the overall transparency of the reporting.