Post Malone’s ex-fiancée’s identity revealed as she fights for custody of their child

New York Post - Apr 18th, 2025

Hee Sung 'Jamie' Park, Post Malone’s ex-fiancée, has filed for custody of their 2-year-old daughter, making her first public acknowledgment as the child's mother. Park submitted a petition to the Los Angeles Superior Court, seeking joint legal and sole physical custody, while also requesting Malone to cover her legal fees. The child, referred to as 'DDP' in court documents, was born on May 26, 2022. Malone had announced the birth and his engagement in June 2022, though he kept Park’s identity private. The couple's breakup reportedly occurred in late 2024, and Malone has since been seen with a new partner, Christy Lee.

The custody battle emerges as Malone displays public affection with Lee, possibly prompting Park's legal action. The case highlights the challenges of celebrity relationships under public scrutiny and the complexities of co-parenting post-separation. The court's decision could set precedents for similar cases, while also affecting Malone's personal and professional life. Page Six has reached out to Malone for comments, but no response has been received at the time of reporting.

Legal Battle Post Malone Hee Sung Jamie Park Child Custody Christy Lee Los Angeles Superior Court

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a detailed and largely accurate account of the custody dispute involving Post Malone and his ex-fiancée, Hee Sung “Jamie” Park. It effectively captures the public's interest with its focus on a high-profile celebrity, offering insights into the personal lives of those involved. The story is timely and well-written, though it could benefit from more diverse sources and greater transparency about the information-gathering process. The minor factual inconsistency regarding the timeline of events slightly detracts from its accuracy. Overall, the article is engaging and informative, with a good balance of clarity and readability, but it could be improved with additional perspectives and verification of certain claims.

Accuracy

The story is largely accurate, with key facts aligning with available sources. It correctly identifies Hee Sung “Jamie” Park as Post Malone's ex-fiancée and the mother of his child, as well as her legal action for custody. The birth date of their daughter and Malone's public announcements about his family are corroborated by other reports. However, the claim about the couple's breakup occurring in late 2024 seems inconsistent with the timeline, as the current year is 2023. This discrepancy suggests a potential error or typographical mistake in the reporting. Overall, the story is well-supported by the sources but contains a minor factual inconsistency.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view of the custody dispute by presenting the perspectives of both Hee Sung “Jamie” Park and Post Malone. It outlines Park's legal actions and Malone's new relationship, offering context for the custody battle. However, the story could include more details about Malone's stance or any statements from his representatives to provide a fuller picture. The lack of direct quotes or responses from Malone's side could suggest a slight imbalance in perspective.

Clarity

The article is clearly written, with a logical flow of information that makes it easy to follow. It uses straightforward language and effectively organizes the details of the custody dispute, Malone's public statements, and the timeline of events. The clarity could be improved by addressing the timeline discrepancy regarding the breakup date, which might confuse readers. Overall, the story is accessible and comprehensible.

Source quality

The primary source of information appears to be legal documents and reports from outlets like Page Six and TMZ, which are generally reliable for celebrity news. However, the story would benefit from more diverse sources, such as court records or direct statements from the parties involved. The reliance on entertainment news sources may limit the depth of the reporting, affecting the overall source quality.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in disclosing how information was obtained, particularly the legal documents mentioned. While it references Page Six obtaining documents, it does not explain the process or verify the authenticity of these documents. Additionally, the story does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or biases that might affect the reporting. Greater transparency about the sources and methods used would enhance the credibility of the article.