OpenAI plans to release a new ‘open’ language model in the coming months

Tech Crunch - Mar 31st, 2025

OpenAI has announced plans to release its first 'open' language model since GPT-2, inviting developers, researchers, and the community to provide feedback through an online form. This move comes as OpenAI faces mounting pressure from competitors like DeepSeek and Meta, which have successfully launched open models. The company plans to host feedback sessions starting in San Francisco, followed by events in Europe and Asia-Pacific. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, has acknowledged the company's previous hesitance towards open-sourcing and expressed a need for a new strategy.

This development is significant as it marks a shift in OpenAI's approach to model accessibility and collaboration with the AI community. By embracing a more open strategy, OpenAI aims to maintain its competitive edge in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. The decision also reflects broader industry trends where open models offer opportunities for innovation and commercialization. Altman noted that OpenAI's upcoming model would possess reasoning capabilities similar to their o3-mini model, with rigorous evaluation and preparedness measures before release. The initiative underscores OpenAI's intent to balance openness with maintaining model quality and security.

Meta Open Ai Sam Altman Deep Seek Ai Models Gpt 2 Llama Model Open Source Strategy

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of OpenAI's plans to release a new open language model, capturing the company's strategic shift and its implications for the AI community. It effectively communicates OpenAI's intentions and the competitive pressures it faces, although it could benefit from more diverse sources and external verification of claims. The article is timely and relevant, addressing a topic of significant public interest and potential impact. While it maintains clarity and readability, further exploration of competitor perspectives and technical details could enhance its depth and engagement. Overall, the article successfully informs readers about a key development in the AI field, while offering a balanced view of the challenges and opportunities associated with open-source strategies.

Accuracy

The story is largely accurate in its reporting of OpenAI's intentions to release an 'open' language model, as well as the company's efforts to gather community feedback. The article correctly states that OpenAI plans to involve developers and researchers through feedback forms and events, and it aligns with Sam Altman's comments on needing a new open-source strategy. However, the article could benefit from more precise details on the timeline for the model's release, as it only mentions 'in the coming months.' Additionally, while it cites competitive pressures from companies like Meta and DeepSeek, it lacks specific data or third-party verification on these claims, such as the reported 1 billion downloads of Meta's Llama models.

Balance

The article presents a balanced view of OpenAI's strategy by including perspectives from both the company's official statements and Sam Altman's personal views. It acknowledges internal disagreements within OpenAI about the open-source approach. However, the article mostly focuses on OpenAI's perspective and does not provide detailed viewpoints from competitors like DeepSeek or Meta. Including more information on how these companies perceive OpenAI's strategy would enhance balance.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and clearly communicates OpenAI's plans for releasing an open model. The language is straightforward, and the flow of information is logical, moving from OpenAI's announcement to competitive pressures and internal company views. The inclusion of direct quotes from Altman adds to the clarity by providing firsthand insights into the company's strategy.

Source quality

The article relies heavily on OpenAI's website and statements from Sam Altman, which are credible sources for information about the company's plans. However, it does not cite any independent sources or experts to corroborate the competitive landscape or the performance of rival companies. The lack of diverse sources limits the depth of the analysis and could lead to potential bias in favor of OpenAI's narrative.

Transparency

The article is fairly transparent about its sources, primarily relying on OpenAI's official communications and Altman's statements. It clearly indicates where the information originates, which helps readers understand the basis of the claims. However, it does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or limitations in the reporting, such as the absence of third-party verification for some claims about competitors.