NYC legislators push bill to aid Bally’s bid to build casino on Bronx parkland

Two Bronx lawmakers, Sen. Nathalia Fernandez and Assemblyman Mike Benedetto, have introduced legislation to support Bally's plan to establish a casino adjacent to the borough's golf course, formerly operated by Trump’s firm. This bill seeks to reclassify the parkland for commercial purposes, a necessary step for the casino project to proceed. Bally’s, having acquired the lease for the golf course from The Trump Organization in 2023, aims to construct a 500,000-square-foot casino, a 500-room hotel, an event center, and other amenities. Despite facilitating the legislative process, Fernandez and Benedetto emphasize that this move is not an endorsement but a means to ensure transparency and community involvement in the proposal review.
Parallel developments in Queens involve Sen. John Liu introducing similar legislation to support Mets owner Steve Cohen’s $8 billion casino project near Citi Field. This initiative also requires the reclassification of parkland to commercial use, supported by Assemblywoman Larinda Hooks. However, opposition from Sen. Jessica Ramos, who represents the area targeted for Cohen's casino, poses a potential challenge. These legislative efforts are part of a competitive landscape, as multiple bidders vie for up to three casino licenses to be awarded by the state Gaming Commission by year’s end.
RATING
The article provides a largely accurate and timely account of the legislative efforts to support casino development projects in the Bronx and Queens. It effectively highlights the scale of the proposed projects and the legislative processes involved, making it accessible and engaging for readers. The inclusion of perspectives from key stakeholders, such as legislators, adds credibility, though the article could benefit from a broader range of voices, including community members and independent experts, to enhance its balance and depth.
While the article addresses a topic of significant public interest, it could delve deeper into the potential social and economic implications of the developments, providing a more comprehensive view of the controversies involved. Overall, the article is clear and readable, with the potential to inform and engage readers on important issues related to urban development and community involvement, though it could improve by offering more diverse perspectives and additional context.
RATING DETAILS
The story is largely accurate in its presentation of the facts regarding the legislative efforts by Bronx legislators to support Bally's casino bid and the corresponding project details. The article correctly states that Sen. Nathalia Fernandez and Assemblyman Mike Benedetto are introducing legislation to reclassify parkland for commercial use, which is necessary for Bally's project to proceed. It also accurately describes the project's scale, including the planned casino, hotel, and other amenities.
However, the story could benefit from more precise details about the legislative process and the community engagement aspects, such as the specific commitments Bally's made to the Bronx community. The claim about the potential roadblock posed by Sen. Jessica Ramos in the Queens casino bid is also accurate, as she has publicly opposed the project.
Overall, the article provides a truthful and precise account of the situation, with most claims supported by external sources. However, some areas, like the specific legislative hurdles and community response, may need further verification to ensure complete accuracy.
The article presents a balanced view by including perspectives from both proponents and opponents of the casino projects. It highlights the supportive stance of Bronx legislators while also acknowledging opposition from figures like Sen. Jessica Ramos regarding the Queens casino bid. This inclusion of differing viewpoints helps provide a more comprehensive understanding of the situation.
However, the article could improve its balance by offering more perspectives from community members who may be affected by the developments. While it mentions the potential for community investment in the casino, it does not explore the views of those who may oppose the project or have concerns about its impact on the local area.
Overall, the article does a good job of presenting multiple sides of the issue, but it could benefit from a broader range of voices to ensure all relevant perspectives are represented.
The article is well-structured and uses clear language to convey the complex legislative processes involved in the casino projects. It effectively outlines the main points, such as the need for parkland reclassification and the scale of the proposed developments, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative.
The use of direct quotes from the legislators adds clarity to the story by providing firsthand insights into their motivations and intentions. However, the article could enhance clarity by offering more background information on the history of the sites involved, particularly the transition from Trump Links to Bally Links.
Overall, the article is clear and concise, with a logical flow that aids reader comprehension, though it could benefit from additional context in certain areas.
The article relies on statements from key stakeholders, such as Bronx legislators and Sen. John Liu, which lends credibility to the information presented. However, the source quality could be enhanced by including more direct quotes or data from independent experts or community members to provide additional context and depth.
The absence of sources directly from the community or independent analysts means that while the article accurately reports on legislative actions, it may not fully capture the broader implications or public sentiment surrounding the casino projects. Including a variety of sources would improve the reliability and depth of the reporting.
In summary, while the article is based on credible legislative sources, it would benefit from a wider array of voices to enhance its authority and comprehensiveness.
The article is transparent in disclosing the legislative actions being taken to support the casino projects and the potential changes in land use classification. It clearly outlines the steps being taken by the legislators and the requirements for the casino projects to advance.
However, the article could improve transparency by providing more information on the potential impacts of these developments on the local community and environment. Additionally, it would be beneficial to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as financial ties between the legislators and the casino developers, to ensure readers have a full understanding of the situation.
Overall, the article is reasonably transparent about the legislative process and the intentions behind the proposed developments but could offer more context on the broader implications.
Sources
- https://www.yogonet.com/international/news/2025/03/19/98612-ballys-offers-bronx-residents-casino-shares-in-bid-for-gaming-license-
- https://www.cityandstateny.com/policy/2025/02/breaking-down-every-2025-new-york-casino-licenses-bid/402815/
- https://www.actionnetwork.com/news/casino-plans-near-citi-field-bolstered-by-new-legislation-proposal
- https://metsmerizedonline.com/state-senator-liu-gives-steve-cohen-permission-for-casino/
- https://www.playny.com/new-york-senator-will-introduce-parkland-alienation-bill-in-exchange-for-additional-infrastructure-commitment-from-cohen-hard-rock/
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Here’s where real estate prices are dropping in NYC this year: reports
Score 7.6
Green-energy madness will turn NYC family homes into firetraps
Score 6.4
Juan Soto’s strong throwing arm helps Mets win seventh straight game
Score 7.0
Las Vegas Sands drops bid to open $4B casino complex at Nassau Coliseum site
Score 7.8