Now you can generate images directly from ChatGPT and Sora

Engadget - Mar 25th, 2025

OpenAI has announced a new feature enabling all ChatGPT users to generate images directly within the platform. This capability, which is being rolled out to ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Team, and Free users, will leverage the GPT-4o model's multimodal abilities. Users can now effortlessly create images from prompts without needing to access DALL-E. This includes transforming pre-existing images and generating high-quality visuals with improved text rendering and contextual understanding. The feature is intended for both personal and professional use, aiding in creating infographics, social media graphics, and more.

The GPT-4o model, introduced last year, underpins this new functionality with its omni-modal capabilities, enabling seamless integration of audio, vision, and text processing. The introduction of this tool is part of OpenAI's broader vision to provide a unified AI solution that can handle diverse tasks. This development signifies a step toward realizing the comprehensive AI functionality teased by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. It reflects the ongoing evolution of AI technologies in enhancing creative and professional workflows, potentially transforming various industries with its photorealistic and contextually aware capabilities.

Ai Technology Open Ai Chat Gpt Sam Altman Gpt 4o Image Generation Multimodal Ai

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of OpenAI's new features, focusing on the integration of image generation capabilities within ChatGPT. It is timely and relevant, effectively capturing the public's interest in AI advancements. However, the lack of diverse perspectives and detailed source attributions affects its balance and source quality. The article could benefit from a more transparent explanation of its claims and a critical examination of potential ethical implications. Overall, it is a well-structured and engaging piece, but it could be improved by addressing these limitations to enhance its depth and credibility.

Accuracy

The article is largely accurate in its claims about OpenAI's new features, such as the integration of image generation capabilities within ChatGPT and the use of the GPT-4o model. The claim that these features are available to Free users aligns with OpenAI's recent announcements. However, the story could be more precise about the rollout's specifics, such as how these features will be limited or monitored for Free users. The mention of improvements in text rendering and contextual understanding is consistent with OpenAI's stated advancements, though further details on these improvements would enhance verifiability.

Balance

The article presents a mostly balanced view of OpenAI's new features, focusing on both personal and professional applications. However, it lacks a critical perspective on potential downsides or ethical considerations related to AI-generated content, such as misuse or the impact on creative industries. Including viewpoints from AI ethics experts or critics could provide a more rounded perspective.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, effectively conveying the main points about OpenAI's new features. The language is straightforward, making it accessible to a general audience. However, the inclusion of technical terms like 'multimodal capabilities' without explanation may confuse some readers. Simplifying or explaining such terms could improve clarity further.

Source quality

The article references OpenAI's announcements and features but lacks direct quotes or detailed attributions from authoritative sources within OpenAI. Including interviews or statements from OpenAI representatives or AI experts would enhance the credibility and depth of the reporting. The reliance on OpenAI's promotional language suggests potential bias, underscoring the need for independent verification.

Transparency

The article does not clearly disclose the basis for its claims, such as the specific sources of information or any potential conflicts of interest. While it summarizes OpenAI's announcements, it would benefit from explicit citations or links to official statements or press releases. This lack of transparency could affect reader trust, as the basis for the claims is not fully explained.