Nikki Glaser Spent Nearly $100K on Taylor Swift Eras Tour Shows: ‘I Would’ve Paid Even More’

Billboard - Dec 19th, 2024
Open on Billboard

Comedian Nikki Glaser spent nearly $100,000 attending 22 shows of Taylor Swift's Eras Tour, covering expenses such as travel, accommodations, and tickets for herself and her guests. She expressed no regrets about the expenditure, emphasizing her long-standing admiration for Swift. Initially planning to use her savings for egg freezing, Glaser opted to follow the tour instead. Despite her 'addiction' to attending the concerts, she now has to stop with Swift concluding her tour. Glaser rationalizes her spending by noting she doesn't have children, and compared the cost to raising a child, making it easier to justify her decision.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.4
Moderately Fair
Read with skepticism

The article provides an entertaining piece about Nikki Glaser's fandom and financial commitment to attending Taylor Swift's concerts. However, it lacks depth in terms of source quality and balance.

RATING DETAILS

7
Accuracy

The article appears to be factually accurate in its reporting of Nikki Glaser's statements and actions. However, the figures mentioned, such as the $100,000 expense, are not independently verified within the article.

5
Balance

The article predominantly presents Nikki Glaser's perspective without offering additional viewpoints or context on the broader implications of such spending. It could benefit from including opinions or perspectives from financial experts or fans.

8
Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, using neutral language. The narrative is easy to follow, and the tone is appropriate for an entertainment piece.

6
Source quality

The primary source is an interview with People magazine, which is a credible source for entertainment news. However, the article does not cite multiple sources, and the information is primarily based on Glaser's personal account.

6
Transparency

The article lacks transparency about the interview's context and does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations. It could benefit from a clearer disclosure of the interview's circumstances.