New leaked photos show how unexpectedly different the new iPhone 17 might look

New York Post - Mar 18th, 2025

Apple enthusiasts eagerly await the release of the iPhone 17, especially after recent leaks revealed potential changes in the upcoming models. Photos shared on X showcased metal dummy models hinting at new camera designs, including vertical and rectangular bar configurations with varying numbers of lenses. The leaks also suggest the introduction of an ultra-thin iPhone Air, reportedly replacing the iPhone Pro model, which is expected to be only 0.2 inches wide and very light. This model might feature an Action Button instead of the traditional Ring/Mute slider. With speculation about pricing, it is anticipated that the Air will be the most affordable option, though details remain unconfirmed.

The leaked designs have sparked mixed reactions among Apple users, with some criticizing the camera layout while others express excitement over the thinner model. These changes reflect Apple's ongoing efforts to innovate and differentiate its product line amid growing competition. The story also underscores a broader industry challenge regarding battery longevity, as highlighted by Sandeep Unnikrishnan of Lionvolt, who advises users on best practices to maintain battery health. As the release approaches, the anticipation builds, highlighting the iPhone's significant cultural and market influence globally.

Apple I Phone Air I Phone 17 Consumer Electronics Battery Life Smartphone Design Tech Leaks Camera Design

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides an engaging look at the anticipated release of the iPhone 17, focusing on leaked photos and public reactions. While it captures reader interest with timely and relevant content, its reliance on unverified sources and social media comments limits its accuracy and credibility. The article is clear and readable, making it accessible to a broad audience, but it lacks depth and authoritative perspectives that would enhance its reliability and impact. Overall, the story succeeds in engaging readers with a popular topic but falls short in providing a balanced and thoroughly verified analysis.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims about the upcoming iPhone 17, including leaked photos of dummy models and potential specifications for a new iPhone Air model. However, the authenticity of these leaks is not verified within the article, leaving room for speculation. The claim about the iPhone Air's thickness and its replacement of the iPhone Pro model is specific, yet lacks confirmation from Apple or other authoritative sources. Additionally, the story mentions potential pricing and design changes, but provides no concrete evidence or official statements to support these claims. The discussion on battery life is accurate and aligns with general knowledge about smartphone batteries, supported by a quote from a technology officer, adding some credibility to this part of the article.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the potential features and design changes of the iPhone 17, with an emphasis on the leaked photos and public reactions. It presents a limited range of perspectives, mainly highlighting negative opinions from social media comments. There is a lack of balance in presenting both positive and negative viewpoints, as well as expert analysis or commentary from industry insiders or analysts. This narrow focus on public opinion without a broader context or counterbalancing perspectives results in a somewhat skewed presentation of the story.

Clarity

The article is written in a clear and straightforward manner, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. The language is accessible and avoids technical jargon, which helps in engaging a general audience. However, the structure could be improved by organizing the information more logically, such as separating factual claims from public reactions. The tone is neutral, but the reliance on social media comments as a significant part of the narrative might distract from the core information about the iPhone 17's potential features.

Source quality

The article references leaked photos and social media comments as primary sources, which are inherently unreliable and speculative. It does not attribute information to credible or authoritative sources such as Apple, industry analysts, or reputable tech publications. The only named source is a technology officer from a battery tech start-up, which lends some credibility to the discussion on battery life but does not enhance the overall reliability of the article's claims about the iPhone 17. The lack of diverse and authoritative sources undermines the article's credibility.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in its reporting, as it does not clearly disclose the origins of the leaked photos or verify their authenticity. It fails to explain the methodology behind the claims made about the iPhone 17's features and pricing. The article does not reveal any potential conflicts of interest or biases, nor does it provide context for the information presented, such as the credibility of the sources or the likelihood of the leaks being accurate. This lack of transparency leaves readers without a clear understanding of the basis for the article's claims.