The article generally provides accurate information regarding the viewership figures and comparisons with previous years. It cites specific data from Nielsen, a reputable source for TV ratings, which lends credibility to the numbers presented. However, there are some minor inaccuracies, notably in the initial misstatement regarding the order of the games, which was corrected later. The article also lacks specific details about the viewership breakdown across different platforms, which would enhance its factual accuracy. Moreover, while it mentions the 'most-streamed games in NFL history,' it doesn't provide the context of past streaming figures for a more comprehensive comparison. Overall, while the article maintains a reasonable level of accuracy, it would benefit from more precise data and context.

The article appears to favor Netflix's perspective, emphasizing its success in streaming the NFL games without fully addressing the implications for traditional broadcasting or the broader market impact. It includes statements from Netflix and the NFL, highlighting their satisfaction with the streaming debut, but lacks comments from other stakeholders, such as TV networks or advertisers, who might offer a different view on the shift to streaming. Additionally, the article briefly mentions the impact of the games' blowout scores on ratings, but it does not explore this aspect in depth. By not providing a fuller range of perspectives, the article risks presenting a somewhat unbalanced view, focusing more on the positive aspects of the streaming debut without critically examining potential drawbacks or broader industry reactions.

The article is generally well-structured and easy to read, with a clear focus on the NFL's streaming debut on Netflix. It presents the main points logically, starting with viewership statistics and then discussing the broader implications. The language is straightforward and professional, though it occasionally leans towards promotional, particularly when quoting Netflix and NFL executives. The use of emotive language is minimal, maintaining a largely neutral tone. However, some sections could benefit from additional clarity, particularly when discussing viewership comparisons or the impact of blowout scores, which are mentioned briefly without much elaboration. By providing more detailed explanations and avoiding potential promotional tones, the article could further enhance its clarity and readability.

The article cites Nielsen as the primary source for the viewership data, which is a credible and authoritative source in the media industry. However, beyond Nielsen, the article primarily relies on statements from Netflix and the NFL, both of which have vested interests in portraying the streaming debut positively. There is a lack of third-party expert analysis or commentary from independent media analysts that could provide a more rounded view of the situation. The article would benefit from diversifying its sources to include more independent voices and analyses, which would enhance its credibility and provide readers with a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.

The article provides basic context regarding the NFL's deal with Netflix and the streaming performance of the games. However, it lacks transparency in several areas. For instance, it does not explain the methodologies used by Nielsen for data collection or how streaming metrics are calculated compared to traditional TV ratings. There is also little discussion of potential conflicts of interest, such as Netflix's financial incentives in promoting the success of the streaming event. Additionally, the article could disclose more about the broader implications of the shift from traditional broadcasting to streaming for the NFL and its partners. By providing clearer explanations and potential implications, the article could enhance its transparency and inform the reader more effectively.