Navy veteran who proved CNN defamed him sues Associated Press, says he was falsely painted as ‘smuggler’

Fox News - Apr 11th, 2025

U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young, who previously won a defamation case against CNN, has filed a new lawsuit against the Associated Press (AP) for allegedly defamatory statements regarding his role in helping people evacuate Afghanistan. Young was awarded substantial damages after a jury found CNN liable for implying he engaged in illegal profiteering during the 2021 U.S. military withdrawal. Following the CNN case, Young now targets AP for suggesting he was involved in 'smuggling,' arguing this false portrayal damages his reputation and business.

Young's legal actions underscore the potential repercussions media outlets face when accused of defamation, particularly in high-profile contexts like the Afghanistan evacuations. The lawsuit claims AP acted with 'actual malice' and failed to issue corrections despite knowing a Florida court had cleared Young of any criminal activity. This case highlights the broader implications of media responsibility and accuracy, as Young seeks further damages, citing the ongoing harm to his reputation from these reports. The outcome may influence how media entities approach sensitive reporting in the future.

Cnn Defamation Media Responsibility Legal Action Associated Press Zachary Young Afghanistan Evacuation

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely account of Zachary Young's legal actions against CNN and the Associated Press for defamation. It effectively highlights significant public interest issues, such as media accountability and the legal rights of individuals. However, the story leans heavily towards Young's perspective, lacking input from the Associated Press or independent legal experts, which affects its balance and source quality. The language and structure are clear, making the article accessible to a general audience, though additional background on legal terms could enhance comprehension. Overall, the article raises important questions about media ethics and defamation but would benefit from a more balanced presentation of perspectives and increased transparency regarding the sources and context of the claims.

Accuracy

The story presents a detailed account of Zachary Young's legal actions against CNN and the Associated Press (AP). It accurately outlines the legal claims made by Young, including the previous lawsuit against CNN, which resulted in a favorable jury verdict and a subsequent settlement. The article correctly states that Young is now pursuing legal action against the AP for allegedly defamatory statements. However, some claims, such as the exact nature of the AP's article and the specific term 'smuggling' used, require further verification to ensure complete accuracy. The story could benefit from direct quotes or excerpts from the AP article to substantiate the claims made about its content.

Balance

The article primarily presents Young's perspective and the statements of his legal team, which could lead to a perception of bias. While it provides a comprehensive view of Young's allegations, it lacks input from the Associated Press or any independent legal experts who could offer a counterpoint or broader context. The absence of comments from the AP or other involved parties means that the story leans heavily towards Young's narrative without sufficiently exploring the AP's side of the story or providing a balanced view of the situation.

Clarity

The article is generally well-structured and clearly presents the sequence of events regarding Young's legal actions. The language is straightforward, making it easy for readers to follow the narrative. However, the story could benefit from a more detailed breakdown of the legal terms and implications, which would enhance reader comprehension. Including definitions of legal concepts like 'defamation' and 'actual malice' would provide additional clarity for readers unfamiliar with legal jargon.

Source quality

The primary source for the article is Fox News Digital, which has a reputation for reliable reporting but may have inherent biases. The story includes direct quotes from Young's attorney, lending credibility to the claims. However, the lack of direct input from the Associated Press or independent sources reduces the overall source quality. Including a broader range of perspectives and verifying quotes from the AP article would enhance the story's credibility and reliability.

Transparency

The article provides a clear account of the legal proceedings involving Zachary Young and his lawsuits against CNN and the AP. However, it does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or biases that might affect the reporting. The methodology behind the claims is not thoroughly explained, and the lack of direct quotes from the AP article leaves readers without a complete understanding of the basis for Young's allegations. Greater transparency regarding the sources and the context of the AP's reporting would improve the story's transparency.