Navajo Code Talker links restored on DOD sites; other Native stories still missing

Yahoo! News - Mar 20th, 2025

The U.S. Department of Defense and Army restored some articles about the Navajo Code Talkers after removing them during a review process that complied with a directive from former President Donald Trump regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The removal sparked significant backlash, including strong opposition from the Navajo Nation Council, which emphasized the importance of honoring the legacy of the Code Talkers, essential to World War II success. Although some content has been restored, other articles on Native American soldiers remain inaccessible, indicating ongoing issues with the DEI directive's implementation.

The restoration comes after advocacy and pressure from the Navajo Nation, highlighting the broader implications of political agendas on historical recognition. The Pentagon's automated removal process also affected content about other notable Native American military figures such as Ira Hayes and Lori Piestewa, drawing criticism from Native leaders. The incident underscores the sensitive balance between policy directives and the preservation of cultural and historical narratives, raising questions about the future of DEI policies and their impact on minority representation in military history.

Donald Trump Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion U.S. Department Of Defense Military History Navajo Code Talkers Navajo Nation Native American History

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article is well-researched and provides a comprehensive overview of the removal and restoration of Navajo Code Talker articles by the Department of Defense. It accurately presents the events and includes perspectives from key stakeholders, such as the Navajo Nation and Pentagon officials. The story is timely and addresses a topic of significant public interest, touching on broader issues of representation and cultural heritage preservation. While the article is clear and engaging, it could benefit from more diverse viewpoints and additional context on the implementation of DEI policy changes. Overall, the article effectively informs readers about a current issue with potential implications for policy and cultural recognition.

Accuracy

The article accurately reports that the U.S. Department of Defense and Army removed and then restored articles about the Navajo Code Talkers. It correctly attributes this to an automated process complying with directives from the Trump administration regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion. The story aligns with known facts about the Pentagon's acknowledgment of the removal as a mistake and its pledge to restore the content. However, the article could benefit from more precise details about the timeline for the full restoration of the content and the scope of other Native American content affected.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view by including perspectives from both the Navajo Nation and the Department of Defense. It highlights the Navajo Nation's opposition to the removal and their efforts to restore the content, as well as the Pentagon's explanation for the removal. However, it could include more diverse viewpoints, such as comments from other Native American groups affected by the removals or responses from officials who support the DEI policy changes.

Clarity

The article is clearly written, with a logical flow that guides the reader through the sequence of events. It uses straightforward language and provides enough context for readers unfamiliar with the topic. The inclusion of direct quotes from stakeholders enhances the clarity of the narrative. However, the article could further improve clarity by explicitly defining terms like DEI and explaining their relevance to the content removal.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, including statements from the Navajo Nation Council, Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren, and Pentagon officials. These sources are authoritative and provide direct insights into the events and decisions discussed. The article also references a memo from Sean Parnell, which adds to the reliability of the information presented. However, it could enhance its credibility by including more independent expert analysis on the implications of the DEI policy changes.

Transparency

The article is transparent about its sources and provides specific quotes from key stakeholders. It mentions the memo from Sean Parnell as a basis for the removals, which adds context to the actions taken by the Department of Defense. However, the article could improve transparency by offering more details on how the automated process for content removal was implemented and by clarifying the timeline for restoring all affected content.