NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore to swab the outside of the International Space Station for microorganisms | CNN

NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore are set to conduct a spacewalk outside the International Space Station (ISS) to collect samples for the ISS External Microorganisms experiment. The duo, originally part of Boeing’s Starliner test flight, have extended their mission due to technical issues with the Starliner, leading to a planned return aboard SpaceX’s Crew-9 capsule. This spacewalk, Williams' ninth and Wilmore's fifth, involves maintenance tasks on the ISS, including removing degraded hardware and preparing a spare joint for the Canadarm2 robotic arm.
The prolonged stay of the astronauts, initially expected to last just days, has sparked political commentary with figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump suggesting the astronauts were 'stranded.' NASA, however, maintains that the extension was for safety reasons, with a unanimous decision to return them via SpaceX. The mission's findings on microorganisms could impact future lunar and Mars missions by informing sterilization processes. Williams and Wilmore’s mission underscores the complexities and collaborative efforts in ensuring astronaut safety and advancing scientific research in space.
RATING
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the extended mission of astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, detailing their spacewalk and the challenges posed by the Boeing Starliner capsule. It effectively balances scientific reporting with political commentary, though the latter could overshadow the technical and operational aspects. The article is well-written and timely, engaging readers with its clear structure and accessible language. However, it could benefit from additional expert insights and a more detailed exploration of the scientific experiments conducted during the mission. Overall, it succeeds in informing the public about a significant event in space exploration while highlighting the complexities of managing international space missions.
RATING DETAILS
The article accurately reports the extended mission of astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore on the ISS, detailing their spacewalk and maintenance tasks. It correctly mentions the issues with Boeing’s Starliner capsule, which led to their prolonged stay. The description of the spacewalk's objectives, such as the ISS External Microorganisms experiment, aligns with verified information. However, the political statements by Elon Musk and Donald Trump regarding the astronauts being 'stranded' are more opinion-based and require additional verification. The article could benefit from further clarification on the exact timeline for the astronauts' return, as it states 'no earlier than late March' without a specific date.
The article presents a balanced view by including perspectives from NASA, SpaceX, and political figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump. It fairly reports NASA's rationale for extending the astronauts' mission and includes reactions from the astronauts themselves, who do not feel 'stranded.' However, the emphasis on the political comments by Musk and Trump could suggest a bias towards sensationalism, potentially overshadowing the scientific and operational aspects of the story. Including more scientific context or expert opinions could enhance the balance.
The article is well-structured and uses clear language to convey the sequence of events and the astronauts' activities. It logically presents the background, current status, and future plans for the astronauts’ mission. The tone remains neutral, except when quoting political figures, which is clearly attributed. Overall, the article is easy to understand and effectively communicates the key points to the audience.
The article relies on credible sources, such as direct statements from NASA and quotes from astronauts and former NASA Administrator Bill Nelson. It also references public comments by Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which are notable figures in the space industry. However, the article could improve by citing additional independent experts or scientific sources to provide a more comprehensive view of the mission's significance and the technical challenges involved.
The article provides a clear outline of the events leading to the astronauts' extended mission and the objectives of their spacewalk. However, it lacks detailed explanations of the methodology behind the ISS External Microorganisms experiment and how the findings could impact future missions. The article could also benefit from disclosing any potential conflicts of interest, particularly regarding the political statements included, to enhance transparency.
Sources
- https://www.chron.com/business/article/nasa-s-2-stuck-astronauts-take-their-first-20065455.php
- https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/nasas-2-stuck-astronauts-spacewalk-118260632
- https://www.clickorlando.com/tech/2025/01/30/nasas-2-stuck-astronauts-take-their-first-spacewalk-together/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQD4fTDScPE
- https://www.news4jax.com/tech/2025/01/30/nasas-2-stuck-astronauts-take-their-first-spacewalk-together/
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

SpaceX Launches NASA Mission To Relieve Stranded Astronauts On International Space Station—Here’s How To Watch
Score 7.2
NASA's two stuck astronauts are finally closing in on their return after 9 months
Score 6.8
NASA Astronauts Safely Return To Earth After Delayed International Space Station Mission
Score 6.8
2 NASA astronauts head back to Earth after an unexpectedly long mission in space
Score 6.0