Mint Mobile just saved Christmas with its $299 Pixel 9 deal — get it now before it's gone

Tom's Guide - Dec 18th, 2024
Open on Tom's Guide

Mint Mobile offers an impressive Black Friday and Cyber Monday deal on the Google Pixel 9, pricing it at $299, down from its usual $799. This 62% discount includes the 128GB version in obsidian and comes with a 1-year unlimited cell phone plan, making the total checkout price $479. The Pixel 9, featuring a powerful Tensor G4 processor and a dual-camera setup, outshines competitors like the Pixel 8a, OnePlus 12R, and Nothing Phone 2a. This offer also includes significant savings on Mint Mobile’s plan, which is cheaper than traditional carriers, and comes with 7 years of major Android updates. Additionally, Mint Mobile provides a budget-friendly option with the Samsung Galaxy A15, available for $60 plus a year of service for $240. Despite its basic appearance, it includes a triple camera system and a substantial battery.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

4.2
Moderately Fair
Read with skepticism

The article provides a promotional review of phone deals, particularly the Google Pixel 9 offer by Mint Mobile. While it presents a compelling argument for the deal, it lacks comprehensive sourcing and a balanced perspective.

RATING DETAILS

5
Accuracy

The article offers specific details about the pricing and discounts for the Pixel 9 deal. However, it lacks references to external sources to verify these claims. The factual accuracy of the deal's terms, like the original price and discount percentage, is not substantiated with evidence from reliable sources.

3
Balance

The article is heavily biased towards promoting the Pixel 9 deal and Mint Mobile, with little to no discussion of alternative perspectives or potential downsides. It briefly mentions another phone option but primarily focuses on the superiority of the Pixel 9 deal.

7
Clarity

The article is generally clear and straightforward in its language and structure. However, it uses emotive language like 'epic' and 'blows away,' which could detract from its neutrality and objectivity.

2
Source quality

The article does not cite any sources, making it difficult to assess the credibility and reliability of the information provided. Without external validation, the claims made are not verifiable.

4
Transparency

The article lacks transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest or affiliations. It appears to be a promotional piece but does not disclose any such affiliations. More transparency about the author's relationship with Mint Mobile would be beneficial.