The story makes several claims about the shift in beauty standards from the 90s to the present, focusing on the concept of 'Instagram face' and the loss of individuality. While the general sentiment is supported by expert opinions, specific claims about the prevalence of cosmetic procedures and the uniformity of modern beauty standards would benefit from statistical data to enhance factual accuracy. The story mentions the popularity of Gabija Stonys' video, citing specific engagement metrics, which adds a layer of verifiability. However, claims about the distinct features of 90s celebrities and their impact on contemporary beauty standards lack direct evidence or comparative analysis, which would strengthen the article's accuracy.

The article provides a balanced view by presenting both the critique of modern beauty standards and the expert insights that support these observations. It includes opinions from beauty experts and dermatologists, which adds depth to the discussion. However, the story predominantly focuses on the negative aspects of current beauty trends without offering perspectives that might defend or explain the reasons behind the popularity of such trends. Including voices from individuals who embrace modern beauty standards could provide a more comprehensive view.

The article is clearly written, with a logical structure that guides the reader through the main points. The language is straightforward, making the content accessible to a general audience. The use of direct quotes from sources enhances clarity by providing firsthand insights. However, some terms, like 'Instagram face,' could be better defined for readers unfamiliar with the concept.

The article cites credible sources, including beauty experts and dermatologists, which lends authority to the claims made. The inclusion of Gabija Stonys' perspective, as the founder of an organic skincare brand, adds a personal and professional viewpoint. However, the story could benefit from a broader range of sources, such as academic studies or industry reports, to provide a more robust foundation for the claims about social media's impact on beauty standards.

The article is transparent in attributing quotes and opinions to specific individuals, such as Gabija Stonys and experts like Laura Kay. However, it lacks detailed explanation of the methodology behind the claims, particularly those related to the impact of social media on beauty standards. Providing more context about how these conclusions were drawn or referencing studies that support these views would enhance transparency.