M3gan 2.0 gives the doll some upgrades in new trailer

The Verge - Apr 3rd, 2025

Blumhouse has unveiled the sequel to its successful techno-horror comedy, M3gan, with the new film M3gan 2.0 set to hit theaters on June 27th. The story revisits roboticist Gemma, played by Allison Williams, and her niece Cady, portrayed by Violet McGraw, as they face the aftermath of M3gan's initial rampage. This time, a defense contractor uses Gemma's code to create an advanced robot named Amelia, played by Ivanna Sakhno, who aims to dominate the world. Despite knowing the dangers, Gemma must revive M3gan to counter this new threat. The trailer, featuring the playful use of “Oops!... I Did It Again” and M3gan's antics, previews a movie that embraces its campy roots and promises to be an entertaining spectacle.

The first M3gan film was noted for its unique blend of horror and humor, and its sequel looks to amplify these elements. Writer Akela Cooper and director Gerard Johnstone seem to be doubling down on the franchise's quirky tone, suggesting a film that not only continues its predecessor's legacy but also expands on it with more outrageous scenarios. The movie's release is highly anticipated, as it taps into current discussions around AI ethics and regulation, highlighted by Gemma's transformation into an advocate for stricter AI controls. M3gan 2.0's significance lies in its ability to reflect societal fears through a comedic lens, providing both entertainment and a commentary on the potential perils of unchecked technological advancement.

Artificial Intelligence Film Sequel M3gan Blumhouse Allison Williams Violet Mc Graw Amie Donald Jenna Davis Ivanna Sakhno Akela Cooper Gerard Johnstone Ai Panic Techno Horror

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.0

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides an engaging overview of the upcoming film *M3GAN 2.0*, effectively capturing the excitement and anticipation surrounding its release. It succeeds in delivering a clear and engaging narrative, appealing particularly to fans of the original movie and the horror genre. However, it falls short in terms of source quality and transparency, lacking citations and a clear basis for its claims. The article's balance could be improved by incorporating diverse perspectives and potential criticisms, while the factual inaccuracy regarding the trailer's music highlights the need for careful verification. Despite these shortcomings, the article remains timely and relevant, offering insights into a popular cultural phenomenon.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims that align with available information about *M3GAN 2.0*. For instance, the release date of June 27th is consistent with other sources, and the plot details involving characters like Gemma and Cady are accurate according to promotional materials. However, there is a notable inaccuracy regarding the trailer's music, as it incorrectly mentions "Oops!... I Did It Again" instead of the actual song used. This discrepancy affects the precision of the report. Additionally, subjective claims about the film surpassing its predecessor and being a "hell of a good time" are opinions rather than verifiable facts.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the positive aspects of the upcoming film, highlighting its potential to surpass the original in terms of entertainment value. This creates a somewhat unbalanced view, as it doesn't address potential criticisms or alternative perspectives about the film's direction or quality. The piece could benefit from a more nuanced discussion that includes potential drawbacks or challenges the film might face, such as audience reception or critical reviews.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and easy to follow, with a straightforward structure that presents information in a logical sequence. The language is accessible, and the tone is engaging, making it easy for readers to grasp the key points. However, the inclusion of an incorrect song title could confuse readers who are familiar with the trailer, slightly detracting from the overall clarity.

Source quality

The story lacks explicit citations or references to authoritative sources, such as interviews with the filmmakers or official studio announcements. This weakens its credibility, as readers are left without a clear understanding of where the information originates. The absence of diverse sources or expert opinions limits the depth of the reporting, making it difficult to assess the reliability of the claims made.

Transparency

The article does not provide transparency regarding its information sources or the methodology used to gather its claims. There is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or biases, which is crucial for readers to evaluate the impartiality of the piece. The lack of transparency hinders the reader's ability to fully trust the article's content, as it doesn't clarify the basis for the author's assertions.