Logan Paul Says He Knew John Cena Was A Snake All Along

Newsweek - Mar 15th, 2025

At the WWE Elimination Chamber event on March 1st, John Cena shocked fans by turning heel for the first time since 2003, attacking Undisputed WWE Champion Cody Rhodes after winning the Elimination Chamber match. This victory earned Cena a shot at the title against Rhodes at WrestleMania 41. The surprising heel turn came after Cena formed an unexpected alliance with The Rock, a move that has sparked strong reactions, including criticism from Logan Paul. On his Impaulsive podcast, Paul labeled Cena a 'snake' and further mocked him during a WWE event in Toronto by using Cena's signature entrance music.

The heel turn of John Cena, a beloved figure in WWE, marks a significant shift in storyline dynamics, especially as it coincides with his alliance with The Rock. This development is significant for WWE's narrative landscape, as fans have long desired to see Cena embrace a villainous role. Logan Paul's criticism highlights the rivalry between him and Cena, adding another layer of drama to WWE storylines. Cena's past praise of Paul for his dedication to WWE adds complexity to their relationship, potentially setting the stage for a future singles match between them, possibly in 2025, Cena's final year as an active WWE star.

Wwe John Cena Elimination Chamber The Rock Cody Rhodes Wrestle Mania 41 Logan Paul Heel Turn

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides an accurate and timely account of recent events in the WWE universe, focusing on John Cena's heel turn and Logan Paul's reactions. It effectively engages WWE fans by discussing popular figures and dramatic developments. While the story is generally clear and well-structured, it could benefit from more transparency in sourcing and a broader range of perspectives to enhance its balance and credibility. The article's impact is primarily within the entertainment sphere, with limited broader public interest or societal influence. Overall, the story succeeds in capturing the attention of its target audience, providing a comprehensive overview of the situation while maintaining a neutral tone.

Accuracy

The story is largely accurate, with most claims aligning with verified facts. John Cena's heel turn at the Elimination Chamber event and his alliance with The Rock are correctly reported. Logan Paul's reaction and his labeling of Cena as a 'snake' are also accurately depicted. However, the story could benefit from more precise details about The Rock's involvement in the alliance and the nature of the interaction between Cena and Paul. Overall, the story is truthful and precise, with minor areas needing additional verification.

Balance

The article presents a balanced view by highlighting both Logan Paul's criticism and John Cena's past praise for Paul. This dual perspective provides readers with a broader understanding of the relationship dynamics. However, the story could have included more viewpoints from other WWE personalities or fans to provide a more comprehensive picture of the heel turn's impact within the wrestling community.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and easy to follow, with a logical flow of information. The language is straightforward, and the tone is neutral, making it accessible to a wide audience. However, the article could improve by providing more context around the events described, such as explaining the significance of a heel turn in WWE or the history between Cena and Paul, to enhance reader comprehension.

Source quality

The story references Logan Paul's podcast and John Cena's past interviews, which are credible sources for the claims made. However, the article lacks direct attribution to these sources, which could enhance its reliability. Including more varied and authoritative sources, such as WWE officials or sports analysts, could further bolster the story's credibility.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of its sourcing and methodology. While it mentions Logan Paul's podcast and Cena's interviews, it does not provide direct citations or links to these sources. Additionally, the article does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or explain the basis for its claims, which would help readers assess the impartiality of the information presented.