Local farmers, food banks plan for potential ‘blow’ to food assistance output from Trump cut

Yahoo! News - Apr 14th, 2025

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's decision to terminate the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) by November 30 threatens the livelihoods of local farmers in Maryland and the operations of food banks. This program, initiated under the Biden administration, provided critical funding to food banks to purchase locally grown produce from farmers like Jesse Albright, thereby supporting both the agricultural economy and food assistance efforts for low-income households. With the LFPA's end, Maryland food banks, such as the Maryland Food Bank and the Capitol Area Food Bank, will lose millions in funding that facilitated the purchase of fresh, local products, potentially impacting the quality and quantity of food distributed to families in need.

This development comes at a time when the demand for meal assistance in Maryland is at historic levels. For farmers like Albright, the LFPA provided a reliable market, allowing them to expand production specifically for food banks. The program's end will force food banks to reassess their purchasing strategies, likely reducing their acquisitions from local growers and resorting to cheaper produce, which could affect overall food quality. The decision also raises concerns about the broader economic and social implications, as the program was seen as both an economic stimulus and a means of strengthening local food systems. Food bank officials like Meg Kimmel and Radha Muthiah hope for a policy reversal or new initiatives to sustain these benefits, emphasizing the LFPA's unique role in supporting the local economy and food security.

Federal Funding Usda Maryland Food Bank Lfpa Program Jesse Albright Radha Muthiah Meg Kimmel Local Farmers Food Assistance

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.4

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a detailed account of the impact of the LFPA program's termination on Maryland farmers and food banks, highlighting the benefits the program offered and the challenges posed by its end. It effectively communicates the urgency of the situation and its relevance to ongoing discussions about food security and local agriculture. However, the article would benefit from a more balanced presentation of perspectives, including insights from government officials or policymakers. The lack of direct quotes from authoritative sources and limited transparency regarding the basis for certain claims slightly undermines the story's credibility. Despite these limitations, the article remains a timely and informative piece that addresses significant public interest issues.

Accuracy

The article generally presents accurate information regarding the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) and its impact on Maryland farmers and food banks. The claim that the program is set to end and the financial figures related to the Maryland Food Bank and Capitol Area Food Bank are consistent with the reported data. However, there is a discrepancy about the administration under which the program's termination was announced, as the story attributes this decision to the Trump administration, which could be a point of confusion given the program was initiated under the Biden administration. This requires further verification. Additionally, the impact on other states and whether alternative programs are being considered are areas that are not covered in the article but are relevant to the broader context.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the perspectives of local farmers and food bank officials, highlighting the adverse effects of the LFPA program's termination. While it provides a detailed account of the benefits the program offered to these stakeholders, it lacks representation from government officials or policymakers who could provide insight into the reasons behind the program's termination. This omission results in a somewhat one-sided narrative that could benefit from a more balanced presentation of viewpoints.

Clarity

The article is generally well-structured and uses clear language to convey the story. It logically presents the sequence of events and the potential impacts of the LFPA program's termination. The tone is neutral and informative, making it accessible to a broad audience. However, some readers might find the lack of clarity regarding the program's termination by the Trump administration confusing, given the timeline of the program's introduction.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources such as Jesse Albright, a local farmer, and Meg Kimmel, the COO of the Maryland Food Bank, which lends credibility to the claims made. However, there is a lack of direct quotes or statements from government officials or USDA representatives, which would enhance the reliability of the information regarding the program's end. Including a wider range of authoritative sources would improve the article's credibility.

Transparency

The article provides some context about the LFPA program and its benefits to local communities, but it lacks detailed information on the methodology used to gather this data. There is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or biases from the sources quoted. Additionally, the article does not explain the basis for claims about the program's termination, which could help readers understand the rationale behind the decision.