Lizzo Says She Was ‘Blindsided’ by Harassment Lawsuit & That She ‘Did Nothing Wrong’

Billboard - Dec 19th, 2024
Open on Billboard

Lizzo addresses a lawsuit by three former dancers accusing her of harassment, stating the allegations are false and sensationalized. The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles, claims a range of legal wrongdoings. Lizzo expressed her hurt and disbelief over the accusations during an interview with Keke Palmer, emphasizing her innocence. The plaintiffs' attorney emphasized the power dynamics at play and remains committed to proving the claims in court.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The article provides a brief overview of the ongoing lawsuit involving Lizzo, touching on both her perspective and the plaintiffs'. While it offers some context and direct quotes from both parties, it lacks detailed information about the lawsuit's specific allegations and does not provide a wide range of perspectives or in-depth analysis.

RATING DETAILS

7
Accuracy

The article accurately reports on the existence of the lawsuit and Lizzo's and her attorney's responses. However, it lacks detailed information about the specific allegations and legal context, which could improve its accuracy.

6
Balance

The article presents both Lizzo's perspective and a response from the plaintiffs' attorney, offering some balance. However, it doesn't delve deeply into the allegations or provide additional viewpoints, which could help readers understand the issue more comprehensively.

8
Clarity

The language used is clear and understandable, and the article is logically structured. It avoids emotive language and presents the information in a straightforward manner.

7
Source quality

The article cites direct quotes from Lizzo and the plaintiffs' attorney, which are credible sources regarding the lawsuit. However, the lack of additional sources or expert commentary limits the depth of information.

6
Transparency

The article discloses the primary conflict and provides quotes from both parties involved, but it does not clarify the potential biases or limitations in the perspectives presented, nor does it delve into any affiliations or background details that could influence the reporting.