"It's The New TikTok": National Security Concerns Spike Over China’s DeepSeek

Forbes - Jan 29th, 2025

DeepSeek, a Chinese AI model touted as comparable to those of US tech giants at a lower cost, is facing scrutiny over data privacy and security concerns. The company, based in Hangzhou, collects personal user data such as keystroke patterns and IP addresses, storing it on servers in China. This has raised red flags as the Chinese government has broad authority to access data from domestic companies. Security experts warn against using the app, drawing parallels with TikTok's controversial data practices. The U.S. Navy has already banned its use, and the White House is examining potential national security implications.

Despite the concerns, DeepSeek's open-source nature complicates any attempts at regulation or banning. Users have already created numerous versions of the model, making it difficult to control its distribution. Senator Ron Wyden argues that banning apps like DeepSeek is ineffective and instead advocates for more U.S. companies to open-source their AI models, enhancing transparency and security. He emphasizes that while some American AI models remain closed, DeepSeek demonstrates China's strategic use of open-source principles, which the U.S. should adopt to stay competitive.

China Tik Tok U.S. Navy National Security Data Privacy Ron Wyden Deep Seek Ai Model Open Source

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively highlights significant concerns regarding DeepSeek, a Chinese AI company, and its potential implications for data privacy and national security. It scores well in terms of accuracy, timeliness, and public interest, given the relevance of these issues in today's technological landscape. The article's reliance on credible sources and clear presentation enhances its readability and engagement potential. However, it could benefit from a more balanced perspective by including responses from DeepSeek or Chinese authorities, which would provide a fuller picture of the situation. Overall, the story is informative and timely, but it requires further verification of some claims and a broader range of perspectives to maximize its impact and credibility.

Accuracy

The article presents several factual claims that align with known concerns about Chinese technology companies and data privacy issues. For instance, it accurately describes DeepSeek's data collection practices, including storing user data on servers in China, which is consistent with the company's privacy policy. However, some claims, such as the extent of data transmission to China and the potential for government access, require further verification from official sources or detailed reports from cybersecurity experts. The article also discusses the lack of user control over data, which is supported by expert opinions, but it needs more concrete evidence from DeepSeek's policies. While the story generally maintains factual accuracy, certain claims, like the ability to turn DeepSeek 'evil' to produce malware, need additional evidence for full verification.

Balance

The story provides a predominantly critical perspective on DeepSeek, focusing on potential security risks and data privacy concerns. It includes viewpoints from cybersecurity experts and government officials, highlighting the risks associated with using the app. However, the article lacks perspectives from DeepSeek itself or any Chinese authorities, which could provide a more balanced view. The absence of these perspectives might lead to a biased understanding of the situation, as the article mainly emphasizes the negative implications without offering potential counterarguments or responses from the company.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear language to convey its points, making it accessible to a general audience. It logically progresses from introducing DeepSeek and its claims to discussing the security concerns and potential implications for national security. The use of direct quotes and specific examples helps clarify the issues at hand. However, the article could improve by providing more detailed explanations of technical terms or concepts for readers who may not be familiar with cybersecurity or data privacy issues.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, including cybersecurity experts and government officials, which adds authority to its claims. The inclusion of quotes from individuals like Chris Herndon and Rob Lee lends credibility, as they have relevant expertise in cybersecurity. However, the article could benefit from a broader range of sources, such as statements from DeepSeek or independent analysts, to provide a more comprehensive view. The reliance on expert opinions is a strength, but the lack of direct input from the company being criticized is a notable gap.

Transparency

The article is relatively transparent in its presentation of information, clearly attributing quotes and claims to specific individuals and organizations. It provides context for the concerns raised, such as the comparison to TikTok and the implications of Chinese data laws. However, the methodology behind some of the claims, particularly those related to data privacy and security vulnerabilities, is not fully explained. Greater transparency about how these conclusions were reached would enhance the article's credibility and help readers understand the basis for the concerns.