Infant mortality rises in US states with abortion bans, study finds

BBC - Feb 14th, 2025

A new study reveals an increase in infant mortality rates in US states that have enacted abortion bans following the overturning of Roe v Wade. The research, conducted by John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, estimates 478 infant deaths across 14 states due to these restrictive abortion laws, which might not have occurred otherwise. The study highlights that mortality rates rose among infants with congenital anomalies and among demographics already facing higher average death rates, such as Black infants and those from disadvantaged backgrounds. The study's co-leader, Alison Gemmill, warns that these restrictive policies may be reversing decades of progress in reducing infant mortality in the United States.

The Supreme Court's 2022 decision to reverse Roe v Wade, which had secured the right to abortion until fetal viability, has shifted control back to individual states. As of 2025, 17 states have implemented extensive abortion restrictions, and in these regions, infant mortality rates have increased to 6.26 per 1,000 live births. The research also links abortion bans to increased fertility rates, noting a 1.7% rise in births per 1,000 women of reproductive age in these states. This increase is most notable in states with poor maternal and child health outcomes, potentially exacerbating existing health disparities and access to care for at-risk populations.

Us Supreme Court Infant Mortality Abortion Bans Roe V Wade John Hopkins Bloomberg School Of Public Health Alison Gemmill Congenital Anomalies Fertility Rates

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and relevant analysis of the impact of abortion bans on infant mortality rates, grounded in a study from a reputable institution. It effectively highlights significant findings that are likely to influence public discourse and policy discussions. However, the article could benefit from greater balance by including opposing viewpoints and a more detailed explanation of the study's methodology and limitations. While the clarity and readability are strong, enhancing transparency and source variety could further strengthen the article's credibility and engagement with a diverse audience.

Accuracy

The article presents a factual claim that infant mortality rates have risen in states with abortion bans, which aligns with the study findings from the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The specific figures, such as the estimated 478 infant deaths and the 5.6% relative increase in mortality rates, are consistent with the reported data. However, the article would benefit from a detailed explanation of the study's methodology to fully verify these claims. The mention of increased deaths among Black infants and other disadvantaged groups is supported by the study, but the causal links between abortion bans and these outcomes require further scrutiny to ensure accuracy.

Balance

The article primarily presents the perspective of the study's findings, suggesting a negative impact of abortion bans on infant mortality. It does not extensively cover opposing viewpoints or potential critiques of the study's methodology, which could provide a more balanced perspective. Including insights from policymakers or healthcare professionals who support the bans could offer a more rounded view of the issue.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, presenting the main findings in a straightforward manner. The language is accessible, and the key points are logically organized. However, the inclusion of more context around the study's methodology and potential limitations could enhance clarity and help readers better understand the complexities of the issue.

Source quality

The primary source of information is a study from the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, a reputable institution known for its rigorous research standards. This lends credibility to the article. However, the article could enhance its source quality by including quotes or insights from additional experts or stakeholders to corroborate the study's findings and implications.

Transparency

The article provides some transparency by mentioning the study's lead researcher and the institution involved. However, it lacks detailed information about the study's methodology, sample size, and potential limitations, which are crucial for readers to fully understand the context and reliability of the findings. Greater transparency in these areas would improve the article's credibility.