How Would 'Yellowstone' Have Ended If Kevin Costner Never Left?

Newsweek - Dec 18th, 2024

Yellowstone's series finale left fans questioning how the show might have concluded if Kevin Costner had not departed. Executive producer Christina Alexandra Voros shared insights in a Variety interview, suggesting that while the show's ending — the death of patriarch John Dutton — remained the same, Costner's exit altered the narrative's execution. Although she did not have detailed discussions with creator Taylor Sheridan, Voros mentioned that the shift in storytelling brought about by Costner's absence led to creative choices, including the use of flashbacks. In the finale, John Dutton's daughter, Beth, avenges his death by killing her brother Jamie, who was involved in their father's murder plot. Voros noted that restrictions due to Costner's departure led to innovative storytelling, which some fans had mixed feelings about, but she found it added depth to the narrative.

Yellowstone Kevin Costner Series Finale Taylor Sheridan Creative Storytelling

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article offers an informative look at the events surrounding the series finale of Yellowstone and the impact of Kevin Costner's departure on the storyline. It includes insights from a key production member, providing some behind-the-scenes context. However, the article could benefit from more diverse perspectives and additional sourcing to strengthen its credibility.

Accuracy

The article presents information that appears to be accurate based on the context provided and the statements from Christina Alexandra Voros. However, some details, like the specific changes made to the storyline due to Costner's departure, are vague and attributed to secondhand information.

Balance

The article predominantly features the perspective of Christina Alexandra Voros and lacks a broader range of viewpoints, such as comments from other cast members or Kevin Costner himself. This could lead to a somewhat one-sided portrayal of the situation.

Clarity

The article is clearly written and logically structured, making it easy to follow. The language is neutral and avoids emotive terms, which helps maintain objectivity.

Source quality

The main source is an interview with Christina Alexandra Voros, whose insights are valuable but limited. The article would benefit from additional authoritative sources or direct quotes from other parties involved in the show.

Transparency

The article discloses that the information regarding the storyline changes is 'almost secondhand' for Voros, which is a commendable level of transparency. However, it does not mention any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations.