How To Overcome Common Hurdles In Adopting DevSecOps

Forbes - Feb 11th, 2025

DevSecOps emphasizes integrating security into every phase of the software development lifecycle, transforming security from a final step to a continuous, collaborative process. Key benefits include enhanced resilience, easier compliance with regulations, and faster time to market. However, successful adoption requires a deep understanding of DevSecOps, commitment from all team members, and strategic implementation. Experts from the Forbes Technology Council highlight the importance of education, collaboration, and training as critical elements for overcoming resistance and fostering a culture where security is a shared responsibility.

The story underscores the significance of shifting perceptions where security is often seen as a bottleneck rather than an enabler. By promoting a mindset that views security as integral to development, and embedding security practices seamlessly into workflows, organizations can address common hurdles such as cultural resistance and lack of expertise. The implications of widespread DevSecOps adoption are substantial, potentially leading to more secure software environments and streamlined development processes, ultimately benefiting both developers and end-users.

Forbes Technology Council Software Development Dev Sec Ops Security Integration Collaborative Culture

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of DevSecOps, highlighting its benefits and challenges through the lens of industry experts. Its strengths lie in its clear and organized presentation, making complex topics accessible to tech professionals. However, the article could benefit from a broader range of sources and greater transparency regarding the selection of expert opinions. While it effectively engages its target audience, its potential impact and public interest are somewhat limited by its industry-specific focus. Overall, the article serves as a valuable resource for those interested in the integration of security into software development, though it could be enhanced by incorporating a wider variety of perspectives and more detailed sourcing.

Accuracy

The article largely presents accurate information about DevSecOps, focusing on its integration of security into the software development life cycle and highlighting its benefits such as shared responsibility, compliance, and faster time to market. These claims are consistent with established principles of DevSecOps. However, the article's reliance on expert opinions from the Forbes Technology Council, without additional external sources, leaves some room for questioning the breadth of perspectives. The challenges and strategies for implementing DevSecOps are accurately described, aligning with common industry practices and expert advice.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view of DevSecOps by discussing both its benefits and the challenges of implementation. It includes a range of expert opinions, which helps present multiple perspectives on the topic. However, the article predominantly focuses on the perspectives of industry insiders, which may overlook potential criticisms or alternative viewpoints from outside the tech industry. Including perspectives from developers who have faced challenges in implementing DevSecOps or regulatory experts could provide a more rounded view.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear language to convey complex concepts related to DevSecOps. Each expert's contribution is presented in a straightforward manner, making it easy for readers to follow the discussion. The use of subheadings for each expert's point helps organize the content and enhances readability. However, some technical jargon could be further simplified for readers less familiar with the topic.

Source quality

The article relies heavily on opinions from members of the Forbes Technology Council, which includes reputable CIOs, CTOs, and technology executives. While these sources are credible within the tech industry, the lack of diversity in sourcing may limit the article's depth. Additional sources, such as academic research or independent cybersecurity experts, could enhance the reliability and authority of the information presented.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of its methodology and the selection process for the experts quoted. It does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or the criteria for inclusion in the Forbes Technology Council. Providing more context about the council's composition and the basis for these experts' claims would improve transparency and help readers assess the reliability of the information.