How domestic abusers are exploiting technology
The Week - Dec 18th, 2024
Family-tracking apps designed to ensure children's safety are being misused by domestic abusers to spy on partners. These apps, such as mSpy, covertly monitor phone activities and locations, leading to feelings of violation among victims. Known as 'stalkerware', these apps are often marketed as parental control tools, allowing companies to bypass surveillance laws. Cybersecurity experts highlight an increase in such technology's misuse, with a 200% rise in cases over three years. Other tech exploited for abuse includes video doorbells and smart devices. Many victims are unaware of how to secure their devices or detect spying. Indicators of spying include increased data usage, battery issues, or unfamiliar apps. A factory reset is recommended to remove these apps, but data backup is necessary.
RATING
The article provides a comprehensive overview of how apps intended for child safety are being misused for domestic abuse. It includes various perspectives and credible sources, though more transparency and balance in viewpoints could enhance its effectiveness.
RATING DETAILS
The article accurately describes the misuse of family-tracking apps as stalkerware, supported by credible sources like Sky News, cybersecurity companies, and university researchers. However, specific figures or case studies could further strengthen its factual basis.
The article leans towards highlighting the negative aspects of tracking apps without delving into legitimate uses. Including perspectives from developers or users who use these apps for legitimate reasons could provide a more balanced view.
The article is well-structured and uses clear language to explain complex issues. It avoids emotive language and maintains a neutral tone, making it easily understandable for readers.
The article cites credible sources, including Sky News, the BBC, and cybersecurity companies, which add reliability. However, direct quotes from the original sources or more detailed attributions could improve source quality.
While the article mentions various experts and organizations, it lacks a clear disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or affiliations. More detailed author or publication background could enhance transparency.
