Here’s where to find the most up-to-date flight safety information | CNN Business

CNN - Feb 22nd, 2025
Open on CNN

Recent aviation incidents, including a deadly collision in Washington, DC, and a crash-landing in Toronto, have heightened public anxiety around flying. Despite these events, statistics show that airplane accidents remain rare. A study by MIT's Arnold Barnett reveals a worldwide death risk per boarding of one in 13.7 million between 2018 and 2022. However, for individuals with flight anxiety, data may not be reassuring. Psychology professor Jonathan Bricker notes that anxious minds often seek more information, potentially exacerbating fears.

The aviation industry provides various resources to help anxious flyers understand safety measures. Federal agencies like the FAA and NTSB offer data on aviation incidents, but their technical language can be difficult to navigate. Websites such as Airline Ratings and Air Safety Network provide accessible safety assessments and crash details. Experts like Kristy Kiernan from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University emphasize the importance of understanding aviation safety processes to alleviate fears, countering the stance that information might increase anxiety.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of airline safety, combining statistical data with expert opinions to address both the rarity of accidents and the psychological impact on anxious flyers. It references credible sources, enhancing its reliability, but would benefit from more detailed verification of specific incidents mentioned. The article is generally clear and accessible, engaging readers with a topic of public interest. However, its impact is somewhat limited by the lack of direct links to additional resources and the need for more up-to-date information. Overall, the article effectively informs readers about important safety considerations while highlighting the complexity of navigating aviation safety data.

RATING DETAILS

6
Accuracy

The article contains several factual claims that require verification. For instance, the claim about the collision between an American Airlines plane and a US Army helicopter resulting in 67 deaths in Washington, DC, lacks specific details such as the date and circumstances, which are crucial for confirming its accuracy. Similarly, the mention of a Delta Airlines flight crash-landing in Toronto needs further verification regarding the incident's details and outcome. The article also references a study by Arnold Barnett on airline safety, providing a statistic on the death risk per boarding, which should be checked for validity and methodology. While the article does cite experts and studies, the lack of specific dates and comprehensive details on the incidents mentioned weakens its overall accuracy.

7
Balance

The article presents a balanced view by including perspectives from both aviation safety experts and a psychology professor, which helps provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic. It discusses the statistical rarity of airplane accidents while also acknowledging the psychological impact of safety information on anxious flyers. However, it could benefit from including more diverse viewpoints, such as those from passengers who have experienced flight incidents or additional aviation industry stakeholders, to enhance its balance further.

7
Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow of information. It effectively presents the main points and includes expert opinions to support its claims. However, some sections could benefit from additional context or explanation, particularly regarding the statistical data and specific incidents mentioned. The use of industry-specific language is minimal, making the article accessible to a general audience, but further simplification in certain areas could improve clarity.

8
Source quality

The article references credible sources, including Arnold Barnett, a professor of statistics, and Kristy Kiernan, an associate professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. It also mentions reputable organizations like the FAA, NTSB, and Airline Ratings. These sources enhance the article's credibility, as they are authoritative in the field of aviation safety. However, the article could improve by providing direct links or citations to the studies and data it references, enabling readers to verify the information independently.

6
Transparency

The article provides some transparency by citing experts and mentioning specific organizations involved in aviation safety. However, it lacks detailed explanations of the methodology behind the statistics and studies referenced, such as the airline safety study by Arnold Barnett. Additionally, the article does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest that might affect the impartiality of the experts cited. Providing more context and background on the studies and data would enhance the article's transparency.

Sources

  1. https://newsdata.io
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Citation_Style_1/Archive_7
  4. https://rustechnodvor.ru/tekhnika/s-kh-tekhnika/khim-zashchita-rastenij/opryskivateli-polevye-shtangovye/opryskivateli-op-3000-18
  5. https://www.h2fc-tokyo.com/calendar_detail/id=1367&year=2018&month=2