Here's what happened during Trump's 12th week in office

Fox News - Apr 12th, 2025

President Donald Trump has signed a series of executive orders aimed at deregulating various industries and has increased tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%, while reducing tariffs for other countries during ongoing trade negotiations. The tariffs aim to create jobs in the U.S. by taxing imports, with a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports now in effect. Trump also announced a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs for countries other than China, allowing further negotiation opportunities. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent highlighted that China's economic practices are problematic for global trade.

In addition to the tariff adjustments, Trump signed executive orders to revitalize the U.S. shipbuilding industry and reverse water conservation measures from previous administrations. These actions are part of a broader effort to stimulate domestic industry and counter China's dominance in shipbuilding. The administration is also preparing for nuclear talks with Iran, with Trump favoring direct negotiations, though Iran insists on indirect discussions. The overarching goal of these talks is to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, with the U.S. maintaining all options on the table to ensure compliance.

Donald Trump Scott Bessent China Tariffs Trade Negotiations Executive Orders Iran Nuclear Talks Shipbuilding Industry Water Conservation

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.2

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a timely overview of significant policy actions and international negotiations undertaken by the Trump administration. It covers topics of substantial public interest, such as trade tariffs and deregulation, which have far-reaching implications for the economy and international relations. However, the article's accuracy is somewhat compromised by the lack of source verification and diverse perspectives. The narrative predominantly reflects the administration's viewpoint, with limited critical analysis or opposition viewpoints. While the article is clear and well-structured, enhancing its readability, greater transparency and source quality are needed to bolster its credibility. Overall, the article serves as a starting point for understanding current policy changes but would benefit from more comprehensive verification and balanced reporting to provide a fuller picture of the issues at hand.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims, such as Trump's executive orders, tariff adjustments, and negotiations with Iran. While these claims are plausible, they require verification through reliable sources. The claim about tariffs on Chinese goods being raised to 145% and China's reciprocal increase to 125% is particularly significant and needs economic data to substantiate. Additionally, the description of Trump's executive orders on shipbuilding and water pressure regulations includes specific figures and actions that need corroboration. The story's accuracy is partially supported by plausible details but lacks sufficient verification from authoritative sources.

Balance

The article predominantly presents the actions and statements of President Trump and his administration, with limited perspectives from other stakeholders or opposition parties. The narrative focuses on Trump's policies and justifications without offering substantial counterarguments or viewpoints from affected industries, foreign governments, or economic experts. This imbalance suggests a potential bias towards the administration's perspective, omitting critical analysis or dissenting opinions that could provide a more rounded view of the implications of these policies.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and concise, using straightforward language to convey the main points. It is logically structured, with distinct sections addressing different aspects of the story, such as tariffs, executive orders, and international negotiations. However, the tone occasionally leans towards promotional, particularly in the sections quoting Trump, which might affect the perceived neutrality. Overall, the clarity of the writing aids comprehension, but the tone could be more neutral.

Source quality

The article lacks direct citations or references to primary sources or expert analyses, which undermines its credibility. While it mentions statements from Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, it does not provide links or references to official documents, press releases, or independent reports that could substantiate these claims. The reliance on unnamed sources and the absence of diverse viewpoints or expert commentary detracts from the article's overall reliability.

Transparency

The article does not clearly disclose the sources of its information or the methodology used to gather it. There is no mention of potential conflicts of interest or the basis for the claims made, such as economic data or policy documents. This lack of transparency makes it challenging for readers to assess the impartiality and credibility of the information presented. Greater transparency about the sources and methods would enhance the article's trustworthiness.