Helldivers 2’s Killzone collab is now live, and it’s cool but expensive

Destructoid - Dec 18th, 2024
Open on Destructoid

The recent 'Omens of Tyranny' update for Helldivers 2 introduced a new faction, urban environments, and vehicles, alongside Killzone-inspired cosmetics. While these cosmetics are well-designed and fit within the game's aesthetic, the high price of the Killzone 2 cosmetic pack has caused concern within the community. The pack costs nearly as much as two Premium Warbonds, setting a potentially problematic precedent for Helldivers 2's monetization strategy. Despite the community's dissatisfaction, Arrowhead Games is testing longer item rotations to address concerns about missing out on items. The update reflects a broader trend in live-service games where high-priced cosmetics are used to generate revenue, similar to the approach seen in Destiny 2's Eververse.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.4
Moderately Fair
Read with skepticism

The article provides a detailed account of the recent update in Helldivers 2, with a focus on the new Killzone-inspired cosmetics and the associated pricing model. While it offers some critical insights, the article lacks citations and could benefit from more balanced perspectives.

RATING DETAILS

6
Accuracy

The article presents accurate information regarding the update and pricing, but it lacks verifiable sources or references to authoritative statements, making it difficult to confirm the claims.

5
Balance

While the article touches on both positive and negative aspects of the update, it primarily focuses on the pricing issue, with limited exploration of alternative viewpoints or community reactions.

7
Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, though it occasionally uses emotive language that could be toned down to maintain a more neutral tone.

4
Source quality

The article does not cite any direct sources or provide links to official announcements or statements, which diminishes the credibility of the information presented.

5
Transparency

The article discusses pricing and potential impacts on the game's future, but it lacks transparency regarding the author's potential biases or any affiliations with the game's developers.