Hairy situation: career ‘thief’ steals $30K in wigs from Brooklyn shop that helps cancer patients

New York Post - Apr 26th, 2025

A career criminal, Daron Ware, with nearly 60 prior arrests, was apprehended for burglarizing a Brooklyn wig shop, making off with $30,000 worth of wigs, some potentially meant for cancer patients. The burglary took place at the Hustle Wig shop on Dean Street in Crown Heights on March 4. Surveillance footage showed a man entering the closed shop and leaving with a sack full of wigs and materials valued at approximately $3,300 each. The shop's co-owner, Rivka Krinsky, confirmed the theft, noting they managed to replace the orders swiftly, minimizing the impact on clients. Ware was arrested on March 13 and is currently held at Rikers Island, charged with burglary and illegal entry.

Ware's criminal history is extensive, dating back to the 1980s. He was previously imprisoned for various offenses, including a year for firearm possession in 1990, and 17 years for a 1991 robbery. After his release in 2009, he continued his criminal activities, including a robbery in 2013 and a burglary in 2020. Despite being on parole until 2026, Ware managed to evade authorities for over a year before his latest arrest. This incident highlights the challenges of managing repeat offenders and the impact of their actions on small businesses and vulnerable clients, such as cancer patients relying on specialized products.

Brooklyn Burglary Rikers Island Daron Ware Hustle Wig Shop Cancer Patients Career Criminal

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a detailed account of a burglary at a Brooklyn wig shop, focusing on the suspect's criminal history and the impact on the business. It scores well in clarity and readability, with a clear narrative structure and accessible language. The story effectively addresses public interest by combining elements of crime, community impact, and human interest.

However, the article could improve in areas such as balance and source quality by including a broader range of perspectives and more authoritative sources. While the story touches on controversial issues, it does not fully explore the underlying implications, limiting its potential to provoke significant debate.

Overall, the article is timely and engaging, with the potential to influence public opinion and drive discussions on crime and community safety. However, additional context and a more balanced perspective could enhance its impact and credibility.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims that require verification, such as the number of arrests and the value of the stolen wigs. The claim that Daron Ware has nearly 60 arrests and a lengthy criminal history dating back to the 1980s is significant and needs corroboration from official criminal records. Additionally, the story states that nine wigs were valued at about $30,000, which should be verified against inventory records or insurance claims.

While the article mentions Ware's criminal background, including specific past convictions and sentences, these details should be cross-verified with court or police records to ensure precision. The report of his current incarceration on Rikers Island and the charges against him also need confirmation from the Department of Corrections or similar authoritative sources.

The story's accuracy is supported by specific quotes from Rivka Krinsky, the shop co-owner, which adds credibility to the claims about the impact on the business and clients. However, the exact number of wigs intended for cancer patients and the overall impact on these patients remain vague and should be further clarified. Overall, the article provides a substantial amount of detail, but some critical points require additional verification.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the criminal activities of Daron Ware and the impact of the burglary on the wig shop. It includes perspectives from the shop co-owner, but it lacks viewpoints from other stakeholders, such as law enforcement officials or community members, which could provide a more rounded narrative.

The story could benefit from including Ware's perspective or statements from his legal representation, which would add depth and balance to the report. Additionally, the impact on cancer patients is mentioned but not explored in detail, missing an opportunity to present their viewpoint on how such thefts affect their lives.

Overall, the article leans towards portraying Ware in a negative light due to his criminal history, which is a significant part of the narrative. While this might be justified, including a broader range of perspectives would enhance the story's balance.

Clarity

The article is well-structured and presents information in a clear and straightforward manner. The narrative follows a logical progression from the burglary incident to Ware's arrest and his criminal history, making it easy for readers to follow the storyline.

The language used is accessible and free of jargon, which aids in comprehension. The inclusion of direct quotes from Rivka Krinsky adds a personal touch and helps to illustrate the impact of the crime on the business and its clients.

However, the article could improve clarity by providing more context on the significance of the wigs for cancer patients and how the shop managed to replace the stolen items swiftly. Overall, the article is clear and concise, but additional context would enhance reader understanding.

Source quality

The article relies on police sources and quotes from Rivka Krinsky, a co-owner of the wig shop, which lends credibility to the narrative. These sources are relevant and authoritative for the story's context, providing firsthand accounts of the burglary and its aftermath.

However, the article would benefit from a wider variety of sources, such as official police records, statements from law enforcement, or legal documents confirming Ware's criminal history and current legal status. Including these sources would enhance the reliability and depth of the report.

The reliance on unnamed police sources for Ware's criminal history, while common in crime reporting, can sometimes affect the perceived impartiality of the article. Naming or citing additional independent sources could improve the overall credibility of the story.

Transparency

The article provides a clear narrative of the events, including specific details about the burglary and Ware's criminal history. However, it lacks transparency in sourcing, as it primarily relies on unnamed police sources for significant portions of Ware's background information.

The story would benefit from disclosing how the information was obtained and whether any efforts were made to reach out to Ware or his legal representation for comments. Additionally, transparency about the impact on cancer patients could be improved by providing more detailed information on how the shop managed to fulfill their orders.

Overall, while the article presents a coherent story, greater transparency in sourcing and methodology would enhance trust and credibility.