Google’s regular Pixel 10 will reportedly get worse (but more) cameras

The Verge - Apr 3rd, 2025

Google's upcoming base Pixel 10 may feature primary and ultrawide cameras akin to those in the budget-friendly Pixel 9A, according to Android Authority. While not on par with the Pixel 9's cameras, the Pixel 10 might include a telephoto camera, a first for base Pixels. The Pixel 10 Pro will likely retain the 9 Pro's camera hardware, potentially leveraging Google's next-generation Tensor G5 chip for photo enhancements. The Pixel 10 Pro Fold could also adopt the Pixel 9A's primary camera.

Google is expected to announce the Pixel 10 series in August, following last year's Pixel 9 launch schedule. The Pixel 9A is set for release on April 10th. These developments indicate Google's strategy to differentiate its base and Pro models through hardware and software capabilities, emphasizing the role of the Tensor G5 chip in improving camera performance. This approach could position Google more competitively in the smartphone market, balancing cost with innovative features.

Google Pixel 10 Pixel 9 A Android Authority Smartphone Cameras Tensor G5 Chip Telephoto Camera

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a detailed overview of the potential features and changes in the upcoming Pixel 10 series, with a focus on camera hardware and technological advancements. It benefits from referencing a credible source, Android Authority, which supports its claims, although additional sources could enhance its reliability. The article is timely and addresses a topic of public interest, particularly for tech enthusiasts and consumers considering new smartphone purchases. However, it lacks balance and transparency, as it does not explore a wide range of perspectives or disclose the basis of its claims. The language is generally clear, though some technical terms could be simplified for a broader audience. While the article is informative, it could increase its impact and engagement by including consumer insights, expert analyses, or interactive elements. Overall, the article serves as a useful resource for those interested in Google's upcoming smartphone releases but could benefit from a more comprehensive approach to fully engage and inform its audience.

Accuracy

The article makes several claims about the upcoming Pixel 10 series that align with leaked information from credible sources. However, the story's accuracy is slightly undermined by the speculative nature of some claims, such as the exact impact of the camera hardware changes on photo quality. For instance, the article mentions that the Pixel 10 might use the same camera hardware as the Pixel 9A, which is supported by reports, but it does not delve into the potential implications of this downgrade. Additionally, while the inclusion of a telephoto camera in the base Pixel 10 is noted, the article lacks precise details about its performance improvements. The claim about the Pixel 10 Pro Fold using the Pixel 9A's primary shooter is consistent with rumors, but again, the impact on user experience is not fully explored.

Balance

The article predominantly focuses on the technical specifications and potential hardware changes in the Pixel 10 series, which may lead to a somewhat narrow perspective. It does not provide a balanced view by including consumer or expert opinions on these changes. The emphasis is on hardware specifics, without exploring other aspects like software improvements or market positioning, which could provide a more rounded analysis. There is also a lack of discussion on how these changes might affect Google's competitive stance in the smartphone market.

Clarity

The article is generally clear in its presentation of the Pixel 10 series' potential features and changes. The language is straightforward, and the structure logically flows from discussing the base model to the Pro variants. However, some technical jargon, like specific sensor names, may not be easily understood by readers unfamiliar with smartphone technology. Simplifying these terms or providing brief explanations could improve clarity for a broader audience.

Source quality

The article references Android Authority, a well-regarded source in the tech industry, suggesting a high level of source quality. Android Authority is known for its reliable reporting on technology developments, which lends credibility to the claims made in the article. However, the article could benefit from citing additional sources to corroborate the information, such as direct statements from Google or other industry analysts, to enhance its reliability further.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of how the information was obtained, as it does not clearly state whether the details are based on official announcements, leaks, or speculative analysis. There is no explanation of the methodology used to gather the information, which makes it difficult for readers to assess the basis of the claims. Additionally, potential conflicts of interest are not disclosed, such as whether the publication has any partnerships with Google or other tech companies.