Google’s New AI Video Generator Revealed In Google App Leak

Forbes - Mar 12th, 2025

Google is reportedly expanding the capabilities of its Gemini chatbot by introducing AI video creation features, codenamed 'Toucan.' This new development, discovered by Android app investigator AssembleDebug, indicates that the Google app on Android contains references to this unreleased feature. The system is expected to generate short video clips from text descriptions, taking about 1-2 minutes per video, suggesting a high demand on computing resources. However, there may be daily limits on video generation, hinting at potential premium features or credit systems for extended use.

The introduction of AI video generation by Google could significantly impact the market, where existing options like Kling or Hailuo AI operate on subscription or credit models. While Google has not officially announced the Toucan feature, the presence of code references suggests an impending release. If launched, it could offer innovative content creation tools, but also raises questions about accessibility and cost, particularly if premium tiers are introduced. The development reflects broader trends in AI and digital media, emphasizing the growing importance of AI in creative industries.

Ai Technology Google Android Gemini Chatbot Ai Video Creation Toucan

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.4

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides an intriguing look at potential developments in AI technology with Google's Gemini chatbot. It is well-written and accessible, making it easy for readers to understand the core concepts. However, it relies heavily on secondary sources and lacks direct confirmation from Google, which affects its accuracy and reliability. The story could benefit from a more balanced perspective by including potential impacts or concerns associated with AI video generation. Despite these limitations, the article effectively captures the interest of tech enthusiasts and provides a timely update on emerging AI capabilities. Overall, it serves as a speculative yet informative piece on the future of AI in video creation.

Accuracy

The article presents several key claims about Google's Gemini chatbot potentially gaining AI video creation capabilities, which are based on findings from Android Authority and an app investigator. While the claims are plausible given the references found in the Google app, they lack official confirmation from Google, which leaves room for verification. The mention of the 'Toucan' codename and the specific functionalities such as daily limits and video generation times are supported by code references but need further validation from Google to be fully accurate. The story accurately reports the potential for monetization strategies similar to existing AI video tools, but again, this is speculative without Google's confirmation.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the technical aspects and potential functionalities of the upcoming feature without exploring broader implications or perspectives. It does not provide views from industry experts or potential users, which could have offered a more balanced perspective. There is a slight bias towards the technological excitement of the feature without addressing potential concerns such as privacy or ethical implications of AI-generated content.

Clarity

The article is clearly written and structured, with a logical flow from the introduction of the potential feature to the details of how it might work. The language is accessible to a general audience, and technical terms are explained sufficiently. The article effectively communicates the main points without overwhelming the reader with jargon.

Source quality

The article cites Android Authority and an app investigator, AssembleDebug, which are credible within the tech community. However, the lack of direct quotes or statements from Google reduces the overall reliability. The sources are secondary and rely on code analysis rather than firsthand information, which affects the authority of the information presented.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency regarding its sources, as it does not provide direct links to the Android Authority report or the findings of AssembleDebug. It also does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or the methodology used by the app investigator to uncover the information. Greater transparency in these areas would enhance the credibility of the report.