Google Drive for Windows on Arm PCs is now widely available

The Verge - Mar 24th, 2025

Google has officially released its Drive app for Arm-compatible Windows PCs, marking its transition from beta to general availability. The app, developed for devices running Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processors, allows seamless file storage, synchronization, and access. Available exclusively on Windows 11 devices with Microsoft WebView 2, the app will prompt users who downloaded the beta version to upgrade. This launch aligns with the growing trend of Arm64 support across various applications like Google Chrome, NordVPN, and ExpressVPN, following the release of Qualcomm-equipped Copilot Plus PCs.

The introduction of the Arm64 version of Google Drive is particularly significant in the context of increasing adoption of Arm architecture in Windows PCs. With Microsoft working on its Prism emulator to enhance software and gaming compatibility, the app's release highlights a broader industry shift towards embracing Arm technology. This development not only strengthens Google’s ecosystem but also reinforces the strategic partnership between tech giants to optimize performance on newer hardware configurations. As more apps become Arm64-compatible, users can expect improved efficiency and a more cohesive experience across devices.

Windows 11 Google Drive Arm64 Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft Web View 2 App Release Technology Update

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely report on Google's launch of its Drive app for Arm-compatible Windows PCs. It accurately covers the main points of the release and situates the development within the broader context of the tech industry's shift towards Arm architecture. However, the article could benefit from greater transparency regarding sources and a more balanced perspective by including viewpoints from independent experts or users. While the story is engaging for tech enthusiasts, it lacks the depth and critical analysis needed to maximize its impact and public interest. Overall, the article is informative and well-written but could be improved by addressing these areas.

Accuracy

The article accurately reports the launch of Google's Drive app for Arm-compatible Windows PCs, a fact supported by multiple sources. It correctly states that the app is now generally available, following a beta release last year. The details about the app's compatibility with Windows 11 and its reliance on Microsoft WebView2 are also accurate. However, the article could benefit from more specific references to Google's official announcements or detailed technical specifications to enhance precision. There are no apparent inaccuracies, but further verification of the app's performance and user feedback could strengthen the factual basis.

Balance

The article maintains a neutral tone and provides a straightforward account of the app's release. However, it primarily focuses on Google's and Microsoft's perspectives without offering insights from independent experts or users. Including viewpoints from tech analysts or consumers could provide a more balanced perspective. The absence of critical analysis of potential challenges or drawbacks of using the app on Arm devices slightly limits the balance.

Clarity

The article is written in clear, straightforward language that effectively communicates the main points of the story. The structure is logical, with a clear progression from the announcement of the app's availability to its technical requirements and broader industry context. However, the article could benefit from additional context or examples to enhance reader comprehension, particularly for those unfamiliar with Arm architecture or the significance of this development.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite its sources, which affects the evaluation of source quality. It likely relies on press releases and official statements from Google and Microsoft, which are credible but not independently verified. Including references to specific announcements or third-party reviews would enhance the reliability and depth of the reporting. The lack of diverse sources limits the ability to assess the full spectrum of information available on the topic.

Transparency

The article provides basic information about the app's launch but lacks transparency regarding its sources and the methodology used to gather information. There is no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest or the basis for claims made about the app's functionality and compatibility. Greater transparency in how the information was obtained and any potential biases would improve the article's credibility.