Google Discontinues Nest Protect Smart Smoke Alarm, Smart Lock

Forbes - Mar 28th, 2025

Google has announced the discontinuation of its Nest Protect and Nest x Yale Smart Door Lock as part of a strategic move to create a unified platform for all device makers and developers. Nest Protect, launched in 2013, was a pioneering smart smoke and carbon monoxide alarm that transformed the market with its innovative features like voice alerts and smartphone connectivity. Although the Nest Protect will be supported until its expiration date, Google is partnering with First Alert to introduce a new smart smoke and CO alarm priced at $129.99, which will integrate with Google Home and offer advanced features like a seven-day low battery warning. The Nest x Yale Smart Door Lock will also be replaced by the Yale Smart Lock with Matter compatibility, providing enhanced cross-platform integration.

The discontinuation of these products marks a significant shift in Google's approach to its smart home ecosystem, emphasizing broader compatibility and integration with platforms like Matter. This move could have long-term implications for consumers, offering more cohesive smart home experiences while potentially phasing out standalone products. The transition reflects the increasing trend toward interoperability in smart home technology, seeking to simplify user experiences and expand functionality across different devices and brands. While current Nest Protect and Nest x Yale users will continue to receive updates, the focus on new partnerships and platforms signals a transformative phase for Google's smart home strategy.

Google Nest Protect Nest X Yale Smart Door Lock First Alert Smart Home Technology Matter Platform Product Discontinuation

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a clear and timely report on Google's decision to discontinue the Nest Protect and Nest x Yale Smart Door Lock, while introducing new products in partnership with First Alert and Yale. Its strengths lie in its clarity, readability, and relevance to current technology trends. However, it could improve in areas of source quality and transparency by providing explicit citations or direct quotes from Google. The article presents a predominantly single perspective, focusing on Google's strategic decisions, with limited exploration of alternative viewpoints or broader industry implications. Overall, it serves as an informative piece for consumers interested in smart home technology, though it could benefit from deeper analysis and additional context to enhance its impact and engagement.

Accuracy

The article provides accurate information regarding the discontinuation of the Nest Protect and Nest x Yale Smart Door Lock. The claims about the launch of the First Alert Smart Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm and the Yale Smart Lock with Matter are also verified by credible sources. The pricing details and continued support for existing devices are consistent with other reports. However, the article could improve by including more direct citations or references to official Google statements or press releases to enhance verifiability.

Balance

The article primarily presents Google's perspective and decisions regarding its product lineup. While it does mention user experiences and opinions, such as the author's personal affinity for the Nest Protect, it lacks alternative viewpoints, such as consumer reactions or expert opinions on the discontinuation. Including perspectives from industry analysts or consumer advocacy groups could provide a more balanced view of the implications of these changes.

Clarity

The article is well-written and easy to follow, with a clear structure that guides the reader through the key points. The language is straightforward, and the tone is neutral, though slightly informal. The use of personal anecdotes adds a relatable touch but could be balanced with more objective analysis. Overall, the article effectively communicates the main news without unnecessary jargon or complexity.

Source quality

The article does not explicitly cite sources or provide direct quotes from Google representatives, which affects its credibility. While the information aligns with other reputable technology news outlets, the lack of direct attribution or links to official announcements limits the assessment of source quality. Including statements from Google or interviews with company officials would enhance the article's reliability.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of source disclosure and the basis for its claims. It does not clarify whether the information comes from a press release, an interview, or another form of communication with Google. Providing more context about how the information was obtained and any potential conflicts of interest would improve transparency and help readers assess the article's impartiality.