Get three months of Apple TV+ for only $9

Engadget - Apr 18th, 2025

Apple TV+ is offering a special promotional deal, allowing new and qualified returning subscribers to enjoy its streaming service for just $3 per month for the first three months, amounting to $9 total. This is a significant discount from the standard monthly cost of $10, saving customers $21 over the promotional period. The offer runs through April 24 and is available directly through Apple, not through third-party providers. Notably, Apple TV+ features popular original content like 'Ted Lasso' and 'Severance,' and recently, its shows won 10 Emmy Awards in 2024, including a notable win for 'Slow Horses' in the outstanding writing category for a drama series.

Apple's streaming platform, despite not receiving any Oscar nominations for its films this year, had an impressive presence with 13 nominations in 2024, including Best Picture nods for 'Killers of the Flower Moon' and 'Napoleon.' This promotion aims to attract more viewers to its acclaimed content. The significance of this discount highlights Apple's strategy to increase its subscriber base by leveraging the critical acclaim of its original programming, thus positioning itself competitively in the crowded streaming market. Subscribers are reminded to cancel before the renewal date if they wish to avoid paying the full price afterward, ensuring flexibility and consumer control over their subscriptions.

Apple Tv+ Severance Streaming Services Ted Lasso Emmy Awards Promotional Offer

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article effectively communicates a promotional offer for Apple TV+, providing clear and accurate details about the subscription deal. It highlights the service's popular shows and recent awards, adding cultural relevance. However, the article lacks balance and transparency, as it does not explore alternative perspectives or disclose sources. While it is timely and readable, its impact is limited to individual consumer decisions rather than broader societal changes. The article is unlikely to provoke controversy, focusing instead on factual information about the promotion. Overall, it serves its purpose as an informative piece but could benefit from more in-depth analysis and source transparency.

Accuracy

The story provides accurate information regarding the promotional offer for Apple TV+, which is confirmed by multiple sources. The claim that Apple TV+ is available for $3 per month for the first three months is correct, as is the total savings of $21 off the standard cost. However, the story's mention of Apple TV+ shows winning 10 Emmy Awards in 2024 and specific Oscar nominations needs verification from official award sources. The eligibility criteria and subscription method details are also accurately reported, aligning with standard promotional practices.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on promoting the Apple TV+ offer, highlighting popular shows and awards. While it effectively presents the benefits of the subscription, it does not explore potential drawbacks or compare the service with competitors. This could lead to a slightly imbalanced perspective, as the reader is only exposed to the positive aspects of the offer without a broader context or alternative viewpoints.

Clarity

The article is written in clear, straightforward language, making it easy for readers to understand the details of the Apple TV+ offer. It logically presents the promotional details, eligibility criteria, and renewal information. However, the transition between discussing the promotional offer and the awards could be smoother, as the shift in focus might confuse some readers. Overall, the clarity is strong, with minor improvements needed in the flow of information.

Source quality

The article does not cite any sources directly within the text, which limits the ability to assess the credibility and reliability of the information. The lack of attribution to specific sources, such as Apple or award organizations, means readers must rely on the article's claims without clear evidence of authority or expertise. While the information aligns with known facts about Apple TV+, explicit source references would enhance the article's credibility.

Transparency

The article does not disclose its sources or provide context for the claims made about Apple TV+'s awards and nominations. It lacks transparency in terms of methodology and potential conflicts of interest, such as whether the article is sponsored content. Providing more background on how the information was obtained and any affiliations with Apple would improve transparency and help readers assess the article's impartiality.