From $85 tomato leaf soap to $2,300 Hellmann’s mayo handbags, everyday food is now a status symbol

CNN - Apr 13th, 2025
Open on CNN

A new trend in luxury design and fashion features food motifs as status symbols, with items like corn-shaped stools and pasta box purses selling for high prices. Influencers and designers are embracing this wave, transforming everyday pantry staples into luxury items. This trend is linked to Millennials and Gen Z's willingness to spend more on premium versions of everyday grocery items, which are aesthetically pleasing and often marketed as higher quality.

This cultural shift signals a broader commentary on consumerism and economic disparity. As food prices rise and economic conditions worsen, food iconography becomes a means to display affluence, separating those who can afford luxury from those who cannot. The trend reflects a deeper societal change where mundane groceries are now part of a luxury lifestyle, indicating a shift in how people signify wealth and status through consumer goods.

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2
Fair Story
Consider it well-founded

The article effectively explores the trend of food motifs in fashion and design, providing a detailed and engaging narrative that connects historical precedents with contemporary consumer culture. It excels in clarity and readability, using specific examples and clear language to convey its points. However, the article could benefit from improved source quality and transparency, as it lacks direct citations and detailed attributions that would enhance its credibility. While it offers a timely and interesting perspective on current trends, its potential impact on public opinion or policy is limited by its descriptive rather than critical approach. Overall, the piece is informative and engaging, but further depth and critical analysis could enhance its relevance and influence.

RATING DETAILS

8
Accuracy

The article presents numerous factual claims about the integration of food motifs in fashion and decor, supported by specific examples like the corn on the cob stool priced at $245 and a T-shirt with sardines for $78. These claims are specific and verifiable, providing a strong basis for accuracy. The historical context provided, such as references to Salvador Dali and Andy Warhol, aligns with known art history, adding credibility. However, the article would benefit from direct citations or links to sources that confirm these specific prices and items' availability to enhance verifiability. The economic and social contexts discussed, such as Millennials' spending habits on premium pantry items, are plausible but could be strengthened with supporting data or expert opinions.

7
Balance

The article primarily explores the trend of food motifs in fashion and design from a consumer culture perspective, focusing on Millennials and Gen Z. While it provides a comprehensive view of the trend's rise and its implications, it could offer more balance by including perspectives from critics or those skeptical of such trends. The piece leans towards a descriptive analysis rather than a critical one, which might overlook potential downsides or alternative viewpoints about the commodification of food imagery. Including voices from different socioeconomic backgrounds could provide a more nuanced understanding of the trend's impact.

9
Clarity

The article is well-structured and uses clear, engaging language to convey its points. The narrative flows logically from the introduction of the trend to its historical context and current implications. The use of specific examples and vivid descriptions aids comprehension and keeps the reader engaged. The tone is neutral, focusing on informing rather than persuading, which supports clarity. Minor improvements could include clearer transitions between historical and contemporary sections to maintain flow.

6
Source quality

The article lacks direct attribution to primary sources or expert interviews, which affects its credibility. While it references known figures like Andrea Hernández and Jess Rauchberg, the absence of direct quotes or detailed credentials diminishes the authority of these perspectives. The reliance on general observations and unnamed sources, such as 'experts' or 'designers,' weakens the overall reliability. To improve, the article could incorporate direct statements from industry insiders or cite studies and reports that support its claims.

6
Transparency

The article provides a clear narrative on the trend of food motifs in fashion and design but lacks transparency regarding its research methodology and source selection. It does not disclose potential conflicts of interest or the basis for selecting specific examples, which could affect impartiality. Greater transparency about the article's research process, such as how examples were chosen or data gathered, would enhance readers' trust in its findings.

Sources

  1. https://www.whowhatwear.com/fashion/trends/food-color-trends-2025
  2. https://theboar.org/2025/02/2025-and-food-in-fashion/
  3. https://envoyfresh.com/food-meets-fashion-a-trend-thats-tasting-good/
  4. https://www.foodrepublic.com/1826588/biggest-trends-2025-street-food-couture-unilever-food-solutions-future-menus/
  5. https://sphinxdateranch.com/blogs/news/trends-to-try-in-2025-food-fashion-fitness-and-fun