Framework Laptop 13 (2025) review: getting better with age

The Verge - Apr 17th, 2025

Framework has announced the latest iteration of its modular and upgradeable Laptop 13, now featuring AMD Ryzen AI 300-series chips for 2025. This update continues Framework's tradition of allowing users to customize and upgrade their laptops, as the new chipsets can be installed in existing models. The prebuilt configurations start with the Ryzen AI 5 340 at $1,099 and go up to the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at $2,099. The DIY Edition offers flexibility and cost savings, particularly for those interested in the 120Hz display. The Laptop 13 maintains its design but includes enhancements like Wi-Fi 7 and a new cooling system.

The significance of this development lies in Framework's commitment to sustainability and consumer empowerment by providing a truly modular laptop. This approach challenges the traditional disposable model of consumer electronics dominated by major brands like Apple, which do not offer user-accessible upgrades. Framework's model has evolved from a startup vision in 2021 to a viable and attractive alternative in the laptop market. While some components may not match high-end competitors, the emphasis on repairability and customization keeps the Framework 13 relevant and appealing to tech enthusiasts and environmentally conscious consumers alike.

Tech Innovation Framework Laptop 13 Amd Ryzen Ai Modular Laptops Upgradability

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of the Framework Laptop 13, highlighting its modularity and upgradeability as key features. It accurately presents the new processor options and other updates, although some claims, such as battery life and software quality, would benefit from further verification. The story is timely and relevant, particularly for consumers interested in sustainable technology, but it lacks transparency in sourcing and methodology. While the article is generally clear and engaging for tech enthusiasts, its use of technical jargon may limit accessibility for a broader audience. Overall, the story effectively informs readers about the Framework Laptop 13, though it could be improved by addressing transparency and source quality issues.

Accuracy

The story presents a largely accurate depiction of the Framework Laptop 13, particularly regarding its modularity and upgradeability. The claims about the new AMD Ryzen AI 300-series processors and the ability to upgrade components are consistent with documented features of the laptop. However, some areas require further verification, such as the exact battery life under various conditions and the software quality, especially regarding Linux support. The performance benchmarks for graphics-intensive tasks are also areas that could benefit from additional data to confirm the story's claims. Overall, the story aligns well with available information but could be enhanced by addressing these verification needs.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view of the Framework Laptop 13 by highlighting both its strengths, such as modularity and repairability, and its weaknesses, like mediocre display quality and less powerful graphics performance. However, the story leans slightly toward a positive perspective, emphasizing the company's mission and the laptop's unique selling points. While it acknowledges some limitations, it does not explore potential criticisms or alternative viewpoints extensively, such as comparisons with other modular laptops or detailed user criticisms.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow that guides the reader through the key features and updates of the Framework Laptop 13. However, the use of technical jargon and specific model numbers without sufficient explanation may hinder comprehension for readers unfamiliar with the subject matter. Simplifying some of the language and providing additional context for technical terms would enhance clarity and accessibility for a broader audience.

Source quality

The story appears to rely on credible sources, likely including official announcements and reviews. However, it does not explicitly cite these sources, which makes it difficult to assess their reliability and authority. The absence of direct attributions or references to specific reviews or technical analyses limits the ability to fully evaluate the source quality. Including a variety of sources, such as expert reviews and user testimonials, would enhance the credibility of the reporting.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of sourcing and methodology. It does not disclose how the information was gathered or whether there are any potential conflicts of interest. The basis for the claims made, such as performance improvements and battery life, is not clearly explained, leaving readers without a clear understanding of the underlying data or testing methods used. Greater transparency in these areas would improve the article's credibility and allow readers to better assess the validity of the claims.