Former Davidson College employee accused of peeping in Mooresville faces new charged in Charlotte

Yahoo! News - Apr 27th, 2025

Jeremy Michael Whitworth, a former electrician at Davidson College, was arrested for felony secret peeping after allegedly using cameras to secretly record individuals in campus bathrooms. He was apprehended on November 2, 2024, by the Mooresville Police Department and later released on a $10,000 bond. During a search, police discovered hard drives, computers, and cell phones containing images and videos from various restroom locations, including his home and the campus. The evidence spans over 15 years, indicating a long history of illicit recordings. Whitworth is now facing additional charges from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police for allegedly peeping on a woman multiple times between 2020 and 2021, as well as recording women in public spaces like stores and restaurants.

The discovery of Whitworth's extensive collection of illicit recordings has prompted police to seek potential victims who may recognize him. This case highlights significant privacy violations and misuse of professional access for criminal activity. The ongoing investigation underscores the importance of vigilance in protecting personal privacy in public and private spaces. Authorities urge anyone who suspects they may have been victimized to contact law enforcement. As the story develops, the implications of Whitworth's actions reveal broader concerns about surveillance and privacy in community environments.

Jeremy Michael Whitworth Davidson College Secret Peeping Felony Charges Privacy Violation Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Mooresville Police

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a well-structured and timely account of the charges against Jeremy Michael Whitworth, focusing on the serious allegations of secret peeping. It effectively uses police sources to convey the gravity of the situation but lacks a comprehensive range of perspectives, particularly from the accused or his legal representation. While the article is clear and accessible, it could benefit from more detailed explanations of legal processes and the evidence supporting the charges to enhance accuracy and engagement. The story addresses a significant public interest issue, with potential implications for privacy and security, but its impact is somewhat limited by the absence of diverse viewpoints and detailed evidence.

Accuracy

The story presents a series of factual claims regarding the arrest and charges against Jeremy Michael Whitworth. It accurately reports the arrest date, the charges of felony secret peeping, and the bond amount. However, it lacks specific details about the new charges brought by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department and the evidence supporting these allegations. The article mentions a 15-year span of collected videos, which seems inconsistent with the timeline of charges. Verification of the exact nature of the new charges and the scope of Whitworth's activities outside Davidson College is needed to ensure full accuracy.

Balance

The article largely presents a one-sided narrative focused on the allegations against Whitworth, without providing perspectives from the accused, his legal representation, or Davidson College. While it effectively outlines the police's perspective and the charges, it omits any defense or alternative viewpoints that could provide a more balanced understanding. The absence of comments from Whitworth or his attorney limits the article's balance, as it does not explore potential defenses or explanations for the accused's actions.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and straightforward, with a logical structure that outlines the sequence of events leading to Whitworth's arrest. The language is accessible, and the tone is neutral, which aids in comprehension. However, the story could benefit from more detailed explanations of legal terms and the implications of the charges to enhance reader understanding.

Source quality

The story references information from police reports and a named police chief, which suggests a reliance on official sources. However, it lacks direct quotes or statements from primary sources such as court documents, the accused's legal team, or Davidson College representatives. The use of a secondary source, 'The Charlotte Observer,' adds some credibility, but the story would benefit from a broader range of authoritative sources to enhance its reliability.

Transparency

The article provides some transparency regarding the origin of its information, citing police statements and a secondary news outlet. However, it does not disclose the methodology behind the investigation or the process through which the evidence was gathered and verified. Additionally, there is no discussion of any potential conflicts of interest or biases in the reporting, which could affect the article's impartiality.