Florida high school teacher loses job for using student's preferred name

Melissa Calhoun, a teacher at Satellite High School in Brevard County, Florida, was denied contract renewal for the 2025-2026 school year after using a student's preferred name without parental permission. This action is in compliance with Florida's House Bill 1069, which mandates that parents must approve any deviation from a student's legal name or pronouns. The school district was alerted by a parent, leading to a reprimand for Calhoun. This incident highlights the state's forced outing policy, which many criticize for potentially harming LGBTQ+ students by exposing their identities without consent.
The dismissal of Calhoun, a respected teacher known for her inclusive approach, has sparked significant backlash. A large group of parents and students attended a school board meeting to support her, and an online petition to reinstate her has garnered over 10,000 signatures. Critics of the policy argue that it can lead to increased mental health issues among LGBTQ+ youth, such as depression, by reducing familial support. The incident underscores broader tensions in Florida over LGBTQ+ rights, parental involvement, and educational policies, marking a contentious chapter in the state's legislative landscape.
RATING
The article provides a well-rounded overview of a contentious issue involving education policy and LGBTQ+ rights. It accurately reports the facts related to Melissa Calhoun's dismissal and the legal framework under House Bill 1069, while also capturing the public response and controversy surrounding the incident. The story is timely and engages with significant public interest topics, offering a platform for broader discussion. However, it could benefit from a more diverse range of sources and perspectives to enhance balance and depth. The clarity and readability are strong, making the article accessible to a wide audience, though additional context on the legal aspects could be helpful. Overall, the story effectively highlights the complexities and implications of the issue, contributing to ongoing debates about identity, rights, and education.
RATING DETAILS
The news story appears to be largely accurate in its depiction of the events surrounding Melissa Calhoun's dismissal. The claim that she was denied contract renewal for calling a student by their preferred name without parental consent aligns with verified sources. The story accurately references House Bill 1069, which prohibits educators from using names or pronouns that do not correspond to a student's sex without parental consent. However, the narrative could benefit from additional verification regarding the specific details of Calhoun's dismissal and the exact nature of the parental complaint, as these are not extensively detailed in the article.
The article presents a somewhat balanced view by outlining both the legal framework that led to the teacher's dismissal and the public support she has received. It includes perspectives from both the school district, which emphasizes parental rights, and from those supporting Calhoun, highlighting the controversy over the law's implications. However, the story could improve balance by including more perspectives from those who support the law or who might have concerns about teachers not adhering to parental guidance.
The article is generally clear and well-structured, presenting the main facts and claims in a logical order. The language is straightforward, making the content accessible to a broad audience. However, the article could improve clarity by providing more detailed background on House Bill 1069 and its implications, as well as clearer attribution of quotes and statements to specific individuals or documents.
The article cites a spokesperson from Brevard Public Schools and references the existing House Bill 1069, which adds credibility to the factual claims. However, it lacks a diversity of sources, such as direct quotes from Calhoun or the parents involved, which could provide a more comprehensive view of the situation. The reliance on a single spokesperson and secondary sources may limit the depth of insight into the broader implications of the incident.
The article provides some transparency by citing a specific law and including quotes from a school district spokesperson. However, it does not fully disclose the methodology behind its claims, such as how the information about the petition's support was gathered or verified. Furthermore, there's a lack of disclosure regarding any potential conflicts of interest, which could affect the impartiality of the reporting.
Sources
- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/florida-teacher-fired-for-using-students-preferred-name-raising-alarms-in-us-education-system/articleshow/120166699.cms
- https://www.cfpublic.org/education/2025-04-09/florida-teacher-will-lose-job-after-calling-student-preferred-name
- https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/florida-teacher-fired-student-name-b2731026.html
- https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2025/04/09/florida-teacher-loses-job-for-calling-student-by-preferred-name/
- https://www.advocate.com/politics/florida-teacher-fired-preferred-name
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Florida high school teacher to lose job after calling student by preferred name: What we know
Score 7.6
Florida teacher first known to be fired for using student’s preferred name without parents’ consent
Score 7.6
Satellite High students show support for teacher
Score 6.4
Lawsuit against Florida ban on 'lab-grown' meat still alive after judge's ruling
Score 6.8