Fight intensifies over bill by former Edison executive to gut rooftop solar credits

Los Angeles Times - Apr 24th, 2025

A new bill, Assembly Bill 942, proposed by Assemblymember Lisa Calderon, aims to significantly reduce the energy credits awarded to homeowners with rooftop solar panels, leading to a clash between union electrical workers, major state utilities, and solar credit beneficiaries. The proposed legislation, which would cut the credit period from 20 to 10 years and terminate incentives upon the sale of a property, has sparked protests led by solar owners and environmental groups like the Sierra Club and the Solar Rights Alliance. The bill is backed by Southern California Edison, where Calderon previously worked, and other utilities, arguing it would alleviate financial burdens on non-solar customers, who reportedly pay higher electric bills due to existing solar credits.

The implications of AB 942 are significant, as it raises questions about equity and fairness in California's energy policies. While Calderon argues that the bill addresses financial disparities, critics, including environmental groups and the rooftop solar industry, contend that it undermines long-standing commitments to solar incentives and could harm efforts to promote renewable energy adoption. They argue that increased utility infrastructure spending, rather than solar credits, is responsible for rising rates. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between utility interests and renewable energy advocates, with a public hearing on the bill scheduled for April 30.

Southern California Edison Environmental Groups Ab 942 Lisa Calderon California Rooftop Solar Solar Energy Credits Utility Companies

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.2

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of Assembly Bill 942, which proposes significant changes to solar energy credits in California. It effectively balances multiple perspectives, including those of policymakers, utilities, environmental groups, and affected homeowners. The article is timely and relevant, addressing a current legislative issue with significant public interest implications. While the article is generally accurate and clear, some claims, particularly those related to economic impacts, would benefit from additional verification and context. The story successfully engages readers by presenting a nuanced view of a complex policy debate, highlighting the potential consequences for various stakeholders. Overall, the article is a valuable contribution to the discussion on renewable energy incentives and equity in California.

Accuracy

The article presents a generally accurate overview of Assembly Bill 942 and its implications for rooftop solar panel owners in California. It accurately describes the bill's proposal to reduce energy credits from 20 to 10 years and the potential impact on homeowners who installed solar systems before April 15, 2023. However, some claims, such as the potential $500 million savings for non-solar customers and the assertion about 97% of constituents paying higher bills, need further verification for precise accuracy. The article correctly identifies the key stakeholders involved, including utilities, environmental groups, and the electrical workers' union, but the economic impact analysis and the equity argument could benefit from additional data to support these claims.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view by presenting perspectives from both sides of the debate over AB 942. It includes quotes and arguments from Assemblymember Lisa Calderon, who supports the bill, as well as from rooftop solar owners and environmental groups who oppose it. The article also highlights the interests of utilities and the electrical workers' union, ensuring that multiple viewpoints are represented. However, while the article does a good job of outlining the positions of these groups, it could further explore the motivations and potential biases of each party to enhance the balance.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, making it easy for readers to follow the main points and understand the implications of AB 942. It uses straightforward language and provides relevant background information to contextualize the debate over solar incentives. The inclusion of direct quotes adds to the clarity by illustrating the positions of different stakeholders. However, some complex economic arguments could be simplified or explained in more detail to ensure all readers fully grasp the issues at hand.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, including direct quotes from Assemblymember Calderon, representatives from utilities, and environmental groups. These sources are relevant and authoritative regarding the topic of energy policy and solar incentives. However, the article would benefit from including data or reports from independent analysts or academic experts to provide additional context and credibility. The reliance on statements from stakeholders with vested interests, such as utilities and environmental groups, may introduce some bias, so more diverse sources would strengthen the article's reliability.

Transparency

The article provides some transparency by disclosing Assemblymember Calderon's past employment with Southern California Edison, which is relevant to understanding potential conflicts of interest. However, it could be more transparent in explaining the methodology behind some of the claims, such as the calculation of savings for non-solar customers and the analysis of equity impacts. Providing more details about the sources of these figures and any potential biases in their reporting would improve transparency.