FCC chair opens investigation into Disney and ABC over DEI practices

Npr - Mar 29th, 2025

Brendan Carr, appointed by President Trump to chair the FCC, has initiated an investigation into Disney and its ABC network over concerns about their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices. Carr's inquiry aims to determine whether these entities have breached FCC equal employment opportunity regulations, with a particular focus on past and present policies. This move follows Disney's recent adjustments to its DEI efforts, including modifying language around classic movies and changing executive evaluations from 'Diversity & Inclusion' to 'Talent Strategy.' Carr argues that despite these changes, the core policies may remain unchanged, emphasizing the need to end any 'discriminatory initiatives.'

The investigation's backdrop includes Disney's Reimagine Tomorrow initiative, which Carr claims advances a DEI agenda through storytelling. The initiative, designed to spotlight diverse voices, recently saw its website taken down, though its social media presence continues. The probe also revisits a 2020 ABC memo mandating that at least 50% of its characters and staff come from underrepresented groups. Disney has responded by stating its intent to cooperate with the FCC's inquiries. This investigation highlights the ongoing debate over DEI practices within major corporations and their alignment with regulatory standards.

Disney Brendan Carr Abc Fcc Dei Diversity Equity Inclusion Regulatory Investigation Robert Iger

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and relevant overview of the FCC's investigation into Disney's DEI practices, touching on significant themes of corporate diversity and regulatory oversight. While it effectively communicates the main points with clarity, the story could benefit from a broader range of perspectives and more detailed explanations to enhance balance and transparency. The reliance on credible sources is a strength, though the inclusion of additional expert commentary would provide a more comprehensive view. Overall, the story is accessible and engaging, with the potential to influence public discourse on diversity practices within major corporations.

Accuracy

The story makes several factual claims that are generally aligned with available information, such as Brendan Carr's role at the FCC and the investigation into Disney and ABC. It accurately notes Carr's concerns about DEI practices and Disney's recent changes to its diversity initiatives. However, the article would benefit from more precise details about the specific regulations under scrutiny and the evidence prompting the investigation. The story's mention of Disney's response is consistent with public statements, but more direct quotes or detailed responses would enhance accuracy.

Balance

The article presents one primary perspective, focusing on Brendan Carr's announcement and his concerns about Disney's DEI practices. While it includes a brief statement from Disney, it lacks a broader range of viewpoints, such as opinions from DEI experts or reactions from other stakeholders. The emphasis is heavily on the FCC's perspective, which may lead to an imbalanced view of the issue. Including more diverse perspectives would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the situation.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and concise, presenting the main points in a straightforward manner. The language is accessible, and the structure follows a logical progression from the announcement of the investigation to Disney's response. However, some technical terms, such as 'DEI discrimination,' could be better explained for readers unfamiliar with the topic. Overall, the article maintains a neutral tone, aiding comprehension.

Source quality

The article references credible sources, such as Brendan Carr's official statements and Disney's response. However, it would benefit from additional sources to corroborate claims, such as independent experts or industry analysts. The reliance on primary figures involved in the story is appropriate, but the inclusion of more varied sources would strengthen the article's reliability and depth.

Transparency

The article provides a basic level of transparency by citing Brendan Carr's statements and Disney's response. However, it lacks detailed explanations of the methodology behind the FCC's investigation or the specific DEI practices under scrutiny. Greater transparency regarding the sources of 'numerous reports' cited by Carr and the context surrounding Disney's DEI changes would improve the reader's understanding of the issue.