Favorite Journalism comes from behind to win 2025 Preakness Stakes

CNN - May 17th, 2025

The horse named Journalism, ridden by jockey Umberto Rispoli and trained by Michael McCarthy, claimed victory at the 150th Preakness Stakes held at Pimlico Race Course in Baltimore. Journalism, entering with 6-5 odds, overtook Gosger to finish first in a race that had no implications for the Triple Crown as the Kentucky Derby winner, Sovereignty, was absent. Sovereignty is instead focusing on preparations for the Belmont Stakes. Sandman completed the race in third place. This year's Preakness was particularly significant as it marked the final race at the historic Pimlico venue before its planned demolition and reconstruction.

Looking ahead, the Preakness Stakes will temporarily shift to Laurel Park in Maryland starting in 2026, with plans to return to a newly rebuilt Pimlico by 2027. The decision to rebuild Pimlico comes amid ongoing efforts to modernize facilities and maintain the historic significance of the venue. This transition is a significant development in the horse racing world, reflecting a balance between preserving tradition and embracing necessary advancements in infrastructure. The outcome of this race also highlights the competitive dynamics of horse racing, especially in a year where the Triple Crown is not in contention, emphasizing the strategic choices made by trainers and jockeys in various races.

Journalism Horse Racing Preakness Stakes Triple Crown Umberto Rispoli Michael Mc Carthy Pimlico Race Course Laurel Park

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

5.8

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a straightforward account of Journalism's victory in the Preakness Stakes, with accurate reporting on the race outcome. However, it suffers from a lack of source attribution and transparency, which affects its overall credibility. The article presents the facts clearly but lacks depth in exploring the broader implications of the events described. While timely and relevant to sports enthusiasts, its limited engagement and potential impact on public opinion or policy highlight areas for improvement. The absence of diverse perspectives and detailed context further restricts its balance and public interest appeal.

Accuracy

The story accurately reports that Journalism won the 150th Preakness Stakes at Pimlico Race Course, edging out Gosger. This claim is supported by multiple sources, such as the Los Angeles Times and CBS News. However, there is a discrepancy regarding the odds at which Journalism entered the race. The story states 6-5 odds, while other sources report 8-5 odds, indicating a potential inaccuracy. Additionally, the story claims that the Preakness Stakes will relocate to Laurel Park in 2026, which is not directly verified by the sources consulted, suggesting a need for further verification.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the race results and the future of the Pimlico Race Course, providing little context or perspective on the broader implications of these events. There is a lack of diverse viewpoints, such as insights from horse racing experts or stakeholders affected by the relocation of the Preakness Stakes. This narrow focus limits the balance of the article, as it does not adequately explore the potential impacts on the horse racing community or the local economy.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and concise, with straightforward language and a logical structure. The main events and outcomes of the race are presented in a coherent manner, making it easy for readers to understand the key points. However, the lack of detailed context or background information may leave some readers with unanswered questions about the significance of the events described.

Source quality

The story does not provide direct citations or references to authoritative sources, which raises questions about the reliability of the information presented. While the claims about the race results are consistent with reports from reputable outlets like CBS News, the lack of explicit source attribution weakens the credibility of the article. The absence of diverse or authoritative voices further detracts from the overall quality of the sources.

Transparency

The article lacks transparency in terms of sourcing and methodology. There is no disclosure of how the information was obtained or whether there are any potential conflicts of interest. The absence of context or explanation regarding the basis of certain claims, such as the future plans for Pimlico, limits the reader's ability to assess the impartiality and reliability of the information.