Experts warn against cooking this popular food in the air fryer — it’s a surprising fire hazard

New York Post - Mar 21st, 2025

Experts are advising against using air fryers to make popcorn due to safety concerns and suboptimal results. Consumer journalist Grace Forell highlighted that air fryers typically do not reach high enough temperatures to pop popcorn kernels effectively. Moreover, she warned that kernels could become lodged in the heating elements of the appliance, posing a fire hazard. Despite some amateur chefs on Reddit suggesting workarounds, such as using aluminum foil, experienced users affirm that air fryers fail to deliver the desired popcorn quality, recommending traditional methods like the microwave instead.

The discussion extends to other foods that should not be cooked in air fryers, including uncooked pasta, grains, cheesy foods, large meat cuts with bones, and leafy greens. Chef and author Poppy O’Toole remarked that batter-coated foods require direct contact with hot oil, which air fryers cannot provide, leading to unsatisfactory results. This guidance highlights the importance of understanding the limitations of air fryers to ensure safety and culinary success, reinforcing the need for appropriate cooking methods for specific foods.

Air Fryers Popcorn Grace Forell Poppy O’toole Cooking Safety Kitchen Appliances Reddit Discussions

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.8

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a largely accurate and clear overview of the concerns associated with using air fryers for making popcorn. It effectively communicates safety warnings and includes diverse perspectives, though it lacks comprehensive sourcing and transparency about the basis of claims. The topic is timely and of public interest, particularly for consumers interested in kitchen safety. While the article has potential to influence consumer behavior, its impact is limited by the absence of authoritative sources and broader media coverage. Overall, the article is engaging and readable, though it could benefit from more detailed sourcing and exploration of alternative viewpoints.

Accuracy

The story presents a factual claim that air fryers are not suitable for making popcorn due to temperature limitations and the potential fire hazard from kernels getting stuck in the heating element. This claim is supported by external sources that warn against using air fryers for popcorn due to similar safety concerns. The mention of other unsuitable foods for air fryers, such as uncooked pasta and large meat cuts, is generally accurate, though some foods like leafy greens can be cooked with specific methods. The story's claim about batter needing contact heat is also consistent with culinary principles. Overall, the story is largely accurate but could benefit from referencing specific expert sources or studies for greater precision.

Balance

The article primarily presents a cautionary perspective on using air fryers for popcorn, supported by expert opinion and anecdotal evidence from online forums. While it includes a variety of voices, including a consumer journalist and amateur cooks, it lacks a counter-argument or perspective from air fryer manufacturers or proponents who might provide different insights into safe usage practices. The inclusion of a Reddit user's questioning adds some balance but is not sufficient to fully represent all sides of the debate.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and straightforward, effectively communicating the main concern about using air fryers for popcorn. The structure is logical, with a clear progression from expert warnings to anecdotal evidence. The language is accessible, and the tone is neutral, making the information easy to understand. However, the inclusion of more detailed explanations or examples could further enhance clarity, particularly for readers unfamiliar with air fryer mechanics.

Source quality

The article cites a consumer journalist and mentions a chef and author, which adds some credibility. However, it does not provide direct quotes or detailed credentials for these experts, nor does it reference specific studies or authoritative bodies on kitchen appliance safety. The reliance on anecdotal evidence from Reddit, while reflective of public opinion, does not equate to authoritative sourcing. The story would benefit from more robust sources such as industry experts or safety organizations.

Transparency

The article offers limited transparency regarding its sources and methodology. While it cites a consumer journalist and mentions a chef, it does not provide detailed context about their expertise or the basis for their claims. The article also lacks information on how widespread the issue is or any statistical data supporting the claims. More transparency about the sources and the extent of research conducted would enhance the article's credibility.