The article accurately outlines the challenges and requirements for securing AI-driven systems, drawing parallels with the evolution of cloud security. It correctly identifies that AI systems pose unique security challenges due to their dynamic and autonomous nature, which traditional security tools are ill-equipped to handle. The statements about AI-native security solutions needing real-time threat detection and granular control are well-founded and align with industry insights. However, the article's specific claims about Aurascape's funding and its role in AI security need verification for precision. Additionally, the comparison to cloud security evolution is broadly accurate but requires more detailed evidence to fully substantiate the analogy.

The article presents a balanced view of the necessity for AI-native security tools, highlighting both the potential and the risks associated with AI integration into business operations. It discusses the inadequacies of traditional security tools without dismissing their foundational role. However, the article primarily focuses on the perspective of Aurascape and its CEO, which might suggest a slight bias towards promoting this company as a key player in AI security solutions. Including viewpoints from other industry experts or companies could provide a more comprehensive perspective on the topic.

The article is generally clear and well-structured, effectively communicating the complexities of AI security and the rationale for AI-native solutions. The language is accessible, making it suitable for a wide audience. However, some technical terms, such as 'agentic AI' and 'AI-native security tools,' could be better explained for readers unfamiliar with AI jargon. The article's flow is logical, but it could benefit from more explicit connections between examples and broader industry trends.

The primary source of information in the article is Moinul Khan, co-founder and CEO of Aurascape, which provides a credible insider perspective on AI security challenges. However, the reliance on a single company and its leadership introduces potential bias. The article would benefit from a wider range of sources, such as independent experts or academic studies, to enhance credibility and provide a more rounded view of the AI security landscape. The mention of funding and investors adds credibility but requires independent verification.

The article provides a clear narrative on the need for AI-native security solutions but lacks transparency in terms of methodology and the basis for some claims, such as the specifics of Aurascape's capabilities and market position. While it mentions the challenges and solutions in AI security, the article does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest, such as financial ties or partnerships that might influence the reporting. Greater transparency in these areas would enhance the article's credibility.