Energy chief Granholm warns against 'unfettered exports' of liquefied natural gas

Npr - Dec 18th, 2024

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm advised caution regarding the expansion of U.S. LNG export terminals, highlighting potential increases in domestic gas prices and greenhouse gas emissions. A new Department of Energy report indicates that LNG exports could elevate U.S. wholesale natural gas prices and increase global emissions, despite carbon capture technologies. The report also suggests that without restraint, U.S. households could see higher energy costs. The Biden administration had paused LNG project approvals to assess environmental impacts, a move criticized by the oil and gas industry and contested by President-elect Trump, who aims to boost LNG exports to enhance energy dominance. Environmentalists argue the expansion poses significant climate risks and legal challenges are anticipated. While the American Gas Association and pro-LNG groups emphasize potential economic benefits and job creation, environmental advocates express grave concerns over the environmental consequences.

Lng Energy Policy Climate Change Economics Environmental Impact

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.0

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a detailed examination of the debate surrounding LNG exports in the U.S., incorporating various viewpoints on the issue. However, it could benefit from more balanced representation of all perspectives and clearer attribution of sources.

Accuracy

The article accurately reports factual statements from key figures such as Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm and includes data from a DOE report and an independent analysis. However, it could include more specific details about the sources of these studies to enhance verifiability.

Balance

The article presents viewpoints from both government officials and industry representatives, as well as environmental groups. While it mentions opposing perspectives, the emphasis appears to be slightly skewed towards the environmental concerns without equally detailed representation of the industry's viewpoint.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and logically structured, with neutral language mostly maintained throughout. However, some sections, particularly those quoting political figures, could be seen as slightly emotive, which might affect overall neutrality.

Source quality

The article references credible sources, such as the DOE and S&P Global, but lacks detailed attribution or direct quotes from the studies. More explicit citations or links to the studies would improve the credibility assessment.

Transparency

The article mentions the affiliations of some groups (e.g., Friends of the Earth) but does not fully disclose potential conflicts of interest or the basis for certain claims. Providing more context about the involved parties could improve transparency.