El Salvador says it shares gang intel with the US — and requests specific deportees

CNN - Apr 10th, 2025

El Salvador is actively sharing intelligence with the United States regarding gang members wanted by the Central American nation, providing detailed records before requesting their deportation. Security and Justice Minister Gustavo Villatoro confirmed this collaboration, emphasizing that deportation requests are not random but based on substantial evidence. This statement follows the deportation of over 270 individuals by the Trump administration, some alleged to be gang members. Among them is Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, whose case is drawing attention due to claims of an administrative error and a 2019 US immigration judge's ruling that should have protected him from deportation. His family claims his detention in El Salvador is unjust, as he has been accused of gang ties without due process or evidence.

The situation highlights broader issues of due process and transparency in deportation practices, with El Salvador's government reviewing deportation flights from the US to identify gang members. Garcia's case has escalated to the US Supreme Court, which has temporarily paused a deadline to return him to the US. El Salvador's stringent anti-gang strategy, led by Villatoro, faces scrutiny for its impact on constitutional rights and the potential for wrongful detentions. The Cecot prison, where Garcia is detained, reflects these concerns, as its population swells under the country's state of emergency, raising questions about the balance between security and human rights.

Trump Administration United States Due Process Deportation El Salvador Ms 13 Cecot Prison Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia Gustavo Villatoro Gang Intelligence

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a timely and relevant exploration of the deportation process between the US and El Salvador, focusing on the complexities and controversies surrounding alleged gang affiliations. It effectively highlights the perspectives of both the Salvadoran government and the deportees' legal representatives, although it would benefit from additional viewpoints and independent verification of claims. The story's clarity and readability make it accessible to a broad audience, while its focus on public interest issues ensures its relevance. However, the lack of transparency and source diversity slightly undermines its credibility, limiting its potential impact. Overall, the article serves as a valuable contribution to ongoing discussions about immigration and human rights, but it could be strengthened by providing more comprehensive evidence and context for its claims.

Accuracy

The story presents several factual claims, such as El Salvador sharing intelligence with the US about gang members and specifying individuals for deportation. These claims are supported by direct quotes from Gustavo Villatoro, the country's Security and Justice Minister. However, the story lacks evidence to verify these claims independently, as it does not provide access to the supposed intelligence or records mentioned. The mention of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia's deportation due to an 'administrative error' is a critical point, highlighting a potential inaccuracy in the deportation process. The story's accuracy is somewhat compromised by the lack of verifiable evidence for these claims, particularly concerning the alleged gang ties of deported individuals, which are contested by Abrego Garcia's legal team.

Balance

The article attempts to present a balanced view by including perspectives from both the Salvadoran government and the deportees' legal representatives. Villatoro's perspective is detailed, explaining the government's rationale for deportations, while Abrego Garcia's family's viewpoint and legal team's statements provide a counter-narrative. However, the story could benefit from more perspectives, such as those from US immigration officials or independent experts on deportation and gang activity. The absence of these viewpoints results in a slight imbalance, as the narrative leans more towards the Salvadoran government's account without sufficient counterbalance from other stakeholders.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow of information. It effectively outlines the main events and provides direct quotes to support its claims. The language is straightforward, making the content accessible to a broad audience. However, some sections could benefit from additional context or explanations, such as the specific criteria used by El Salvador to determine gang membership. Overall, the article maintains a neutral tone and presents information in a coherent manner.

Source quality

The primary source of information in the article is Gustavo Villatoro, a high-ranking Salvadoran official, which lends credibility to the government's perspective on deportations. The story also includes input from Abrego Garcia's legal team, which provides a credible counterpoint. However, the article lacks a variety of sources, particularly independent experts or third-party confirmations of the claims made by Villatoro. The reliance on official statements without additional corroboration from independent sources slightly diminishes the overall source quality.

Transparency

The article provides some transparency by quoting specific statements from Villatoro and Abrego Garcia's legal team. However, it lacks detailed context about the methodology used by El Salvador to identify gang members or the process followed by the US in deporting individuals. The story does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or biases that might affect the reporting. Greater transparency about how information was obtained and the limitations of the sources would enhance the reader's understanding and trust in the article.