Edgar Berlanga Scores Brutal KO Win In Fight He Never Wanted To Have

Forbes - Mar 16th, 2025

Edgar Berlanga delivered a swift victory over Jonathan Gonzalez-Ortiz in a one-round match in Orlando, showcasing the disparity in skill levels. Despite the impressive performance, Berlanga expressed dissatisfaction with his placement on the fight card as an undercard performer beneath Austin 'Ammo' Williams. Berlanga, who had recently faced Canelo Alvarez, felt deserving of more prestigious opponents like Caleb Plant or Jaime Munguia. His lack of enthusiasm for the bout was evident as he missed weight by 1.6 pounds, though it proved inconsequential in his quick dispatch of Gonzalez-Ortiz.

The fight marked the end of Berlanga's contract with Matchroom, and tensions with promoter Eddie Hearn were apparent. Berlanga criticized the decision to place him in a co-main event slot instead of headlining a fight in Puerto Rico, which he viewed as disrespectful. Hearn defended Matchroom's actions, citing Berlanga's $12 million earnings over three fights, including a high-profile match with Canelo. As Berlanga enters free agency, the future of his career remains uncertain, with the fighter and promoter seemingly at odds over his next steps.

Boxing Canelo Alvarez Edgar Berlanga Jonathan Gonzalez Ortiz Eddie Hearn Matchroom Boxing Caleb Plant Jaime Munguia Fight Contracts Sports Negotiations

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a generally accurate and engaging account of Edgar Berlanga's recent fight and career dissatisfaction. It excels in clarity and timeliness, offering a narrative that is both current and accessible to its intended audience. However, the article could benefit from more balanced perspective representation and enhanced source quality by incorporating views from independent analysts or additional industry stakeholders. Transparency is also an area for improvement, as the article lacks detailed explanations of some claims and potential conflicts of interest. While it captures the interest of boxing fans, its impact and public interest are limited due to the narrow focus on a single athlete's career issues.

Accuracy

The story provides a mostly accurate account of the fight between Edgar Berlanga and Jonathan Gonzalez-Ortiz, as well as the surrounding circumstances and Berlanga's dissatisfaction with his career trajectory. The claim that Berlanga won by technical knockout in the first round is supported by multiple sources. Berlanga’s dissatisfaction with his position on the card and his opponent is also consistent with his own statements. However, the claim about Berlanga earning $12 million across three fights with Matchroom, while attributed to Eddie Hearn, lacks independent verification and could benefit from further corroboration.

Balance

The article predominantly presents Berlanga's perspective, particularly his dissatisfaction with his fight placement and opponent level. While Berlanga's views are thoroughly covered, the article lacks a balanced representation of Eddie Hearn's perspective, which is only briefly mentioned. This creates a potential bias towards Berlanga's viewpoint, as the promoter's reasoning and perspective on the situation are not given equal weight. Including more of Hearn's or Matchroom's side could have provided a more balanced view of the situation.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and easy to follow, with a straightforward narrative about Berlanga's fight and career dissatisfaction. However, certain sections could benefit from more structured presentation, particularly in discussing the contractual and promotional issues. The tone remains neutral, but occasionally the language leans towards sensationalism, especially when describing Berlanga's dominance in the fight.

Source quality

The article cites Berlanga's direct quotes and attributes other statements to Eddie Hearn, indicating a reliance on primary sources. However, the lack of additional sources or perspectives beyond these two main figures limits the overall source quality. The article would benefit from input from independent boxing analysts or other industry experts to enhance its credibility and provide a broader context.

Transparency

The article provides clear attributions for Berlanga's statements but lacks transparency regarding the methodology used to verify claims, such as the financial details of Berlanga's earnings or the specifics of his contract with Matchroom. The absence of detailed explanations or disclosures about potential conflicts of interest, such as Berlanga's relationship with the author or publication, affects the transparency score.