The news story about Jiggly Caliente's passing is highly accurate, with most claims verifiable through multiple sources. The identity and age of Jiggly Caliente, as well as her real name, Bianca Castro-Arabejo, are confirmed by her family's statements and other reports. The cause of death, involving a severe infection leading to leg amputation, is also corroborated by similar sources.

The article accurately describes her career highlights, mentioning her appearances on 'RuPaul's Drag Race,' her role as a judge on 'Drag Race Philippines,' and her participation in the TV series 'Pose.' These facts are well-documented and supported by the available sources.

The story also accurately captures the time and circumstances of her death, as stated by her family, adding credibility to the report. However, the article lacks specific details about the nature of the infection and her activism, which are areas that could benefit from further verification. Overall, the story is well-supported by evidence and maintains a high level of factual accuracy.

The article maintains a generally balanced tone, focusing on both the personal and professional aspects of Jiggly Caliente's life. It highlights her achievements and contributions to the entertainment industry while also acknowledging her personal struggles, such as her recent health issues.

However, the story could benefit from a broader range of perspectives. While it includes statements from her family, it does not offer insights or comments from colleagues, friends, or fans who might provide additional context or viewpoints. Including such perspectives could enhance the story's balance by presenting a more comprehensive view of her impact and legacy.

Overall, the article successfully avoids overt bias or favoritism, presenting a respectful and balanced portrayal of Jiggly Caliente's life and career. Yet, it could achieve greater balance by incorporating a wider array of voices and viewpoints.

The article is written with clarity, using straightforward language that effectively communicates the key facts about Jiggly Caliente's life and passing. The structure is logical, with the narrative flowing smoothly from her identity and career to the circumstances surrounding her death.

The language is neutral and respectful, appropriate for the subject matter, and avoids sensationalism. This tone ensures that the information is accessible to a broad audience, maintaining a focus on the factual and emotional aspects of the story.

However, the article could improve clarity by providing more detailed information on certain aspects, such as the specific nature of her infection and her activism. These additions would help readers gain a more comprehensive understanding of the story.

The article relies on credible sources, primarily statements from Jiggly Caliente's family, which are considered authoritative in confirming personal details about her life and passing. The inclusion of her family's Instagram statement adds authenticity and reliability to the report.

While the article effectively uses these primary sources, it lacks a diverse range of secondary sources, such as interviews with industry experts or comments from fellow performers. Including such sources could enhance the depth and reliability of the reporting.

Overall, the source quality is strong due to the authoritative nature of the family statements, but the article would benefit from additional sources to provide a more rounded perspective on Jiggly Caliente's life and career.

The article demonstrates a reasonable level of transparency by clearly attributing key information to Jiggly Caliente's family. This transparency is evident in the direct quotes from their Instagram statement, which form the basis for much of the factual content.

However, the article could improve its transparency by providing more context about the sources of information, particularly regarding her career achievements and health issues. For instance, mentioning the platforms or events where she performed or the specific nature of her activism would offer readers a clearer understanding of the basis for these claims.

Overall, while the article is transparent in its core reporting, additional context and explanation of sources would enhance its transparency further.