Disney shareholders vote to keep letting company participate in DEI workplace survey

New York Post - Mar 20th, 2025

Disney shareholders overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to withdraw from the Human Rights Campaign’s corporate equality index, which rates workplaces on LGBTQ equality. With only 1% of shareholders supporting the measure, Disney, under CEO Bob Iger, remains committed to its diversity and inclusion practices. The proposal had argued that Disney's involvement in such initiatives alienates certain audience segments and negatively impacts stock prices. Despite this, Disney reassured investors that its board already oversees workforce equity matters.

This decision is significant in the context of a broader retreat from DEI efforts among U.S. companies, partly due to pressure from the Trump administration. Other companies, such as Ford and Harley-Davidson, have ceased participating in the equality index. Despite these trends, Disney continues to uphold its commitment to workplace inclusivity, demonstrated by its perfect equality index score for 2025. Additionally, Disney's board and executive compensation strategies were reaffirmed by shareholders, signaling continued support for the company's overall strategic direction.

Disney Trump Administration Ford Bob Iger Diversity And Inclusion Human Rights Campaign Lgbtq Corporate Equality Index Shareholder Proposal Harley Davidson

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.4

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article provides a timely and relevant discussion of Disney's shareholder vote on DEI practices, highlighting the tension between corporate social responsibility and shareholder interests. It is mostly accurate, though some claims require further verification. The article is clear and engaging, with potential to influence public opinion and spark debate. However, it would benefit from a broader range of perspectives and more detailed sourcing to enhance credibility and balance. Overall, the article effectively addresses a significant issue with implications for corporate governance and social justice.

Accuracy

The article presents several factual claims that are generally aligned with known information, such as Disney's participation in the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index and the outcome of the shareholder vote. However, the claim that only 1% of shareholders supported the proposal needs verification, as does the assertion that companies like Ford and Harley-Davidson have ended their participation in the index. The mention of the Trump administration's influence on DEI practices is accurate but requires more specific evidence to support the claim. Overall, the article is mostly accurate but would benefit from additional verification of specific details and claims.

Balance

The article provides a primary focus on Disney's stance and actions regarding DEI practices, offering some perspective from the shareholders who proposed the measure. However, it lacks a broader range of viewpoints, such as those from employees, LGBTQ advocacy groups, or detailed counterarguments from the proposal's supporters. While it mentions other companies' actions, it does not explore the reasons behind these decisions, which could provide a more balanced view of the broader corporate landscape regarding DEI practices.

Clarity

The article is generally well-written, with a clear structure and straightforward language that makes it accessible to readers. The sequence of events and the main points are logically presented, aiding comprehension. However, the inclusion of more context or background information could further enhance clarity, particularly for readers unfamiliar with the intricacies of corporate DEI practices.

Source quality

The article does not cite specific sources or include direct quotes from stakeholders involved in the shareholder vote or DEI discussions. The lack of attribution to primary sources or expert commentary diminishes the credibility and depth of the reporting. Including statements from Disney, the Human Rights Campaign, or shareholder representatives would enhance the article's authority and reliability.

Transparency

The article outlines the main events and outcomes clearly but does not provide detailed context or background on the methodology behind the Corporate Equality Index or the specific policies of the Trump administration affecting DEI practices. More transparency about the basis for claims and the potential impact of Disney's actions would improve readers' understanding of the issues at play.