The story accurately reports John Lithgow's return to "Dexter: Resurrection" as the Trinity Killer, a claim supported by multiple sources. Similarly, the return of Jimmy Smits as ADA Miguel Prado is also confirmed. However, the article speculates on the nature of their appearances, suggesting they may appear as 'phantoms,' which, while plausible based on Lithgow's statement, remains speculative without additional confirmation. The background details about the original series and "Dexter: New Blood" are consistent with known facts. Overall, the story is largely accurate but includes some speculative elements that require further verification.

The article primarily focuses on the return of specific characters to the "Dexter" series, which could suggest a bias towards highlighting fan-favorite elements. It does not explore other aspects of the series' revival, such as new plot developments or character introductions. This focus on returning characters might omit other significant perspectives or developments in the series. While it provides an engaging narrative for fans, it could benefit from a more balanced view that includes broader elements of the series' revival.

The article is generally clear and well-structured, providing a coherent narrative about the return of characters to the "Dexter" series. It effectively summarizes past series events and sets the stage for the upcoming revival. The language is straightforward, making it accessible to a broad audience. However, the speculative elements could be more clearly delineated from confirmed facts to enhance reader understanding.

The story references Deadline and Variety, both reputable sources in entertainment news. However, it does not directly quote or provide links to these sources, limiting the ability to verify the claims independently. The reliance on a few sources without clear attribution affects the overall reliability and authority of the reporting. Including a wider range of sources or direct citations would enhance the credibility of the article.

The article lacks transparency in terms of source attribution and the basis for its speculative claims. While it mentions statements from John Lithgow, it does not provide direct quotes or links to the original interviews or articles. The speculative nature of the characters' appearances is not clearly distinguished from confirmed facts, which could mislead readers. Greater transparency about the sources and the speculative aspects of the story would improve its credibility.