Daniel Noboa: What to know about Ecuador President and his plans to fight crime

Apnews - Apr 14th, 2025

Daniel Noboa, a conservative millionaire and heir to a banana trade fortune, has won another term as Ecuador's president after defeating leftist lawyer Luisa González in the October 2023 runoff election, securing 55.8% of the vote. Noboa's victory extends his presidency to a full four-year term, allowing him to continue his controversial crimefighting strategies which have resonated with part of the electorate but tested legal boundaries. His win comes after a brief initial 16-month presidency that began with his surprise victory in a snap election. Noboa's presidency is marked by a focus on reducing crime, with a notable decrease in the homicide rate, and fostering relations with the U.S. administration under Donald Trump, which some voters found appealing due to concerns over deportations.

Noboa's governance has sparked debate due to his aggressive tactics, such as deploying the military in internal conflicts and authorizing a controversial police raid on the Mexican embassy to arrest a fugitive. His approach has raised eyebrows globally but reflects his willingness to use constitutional powers to maintain control. Despite his successes, Noboa faces challenges, including a feud with his vice president, Verónica Abad, whom he sidelined by assigning her an ambassadorial role in Israel. This political maneuvering showcases Noboa's strategic handling of power and highlights the complexities of his leadership in Ecuador's evolving political landscape.

Donald Trump Daniel Noboa Luisa González Rafael Correa Ecuador Presidential Election Crimefighting Strategies Guillermo Lasso Political Tactics

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

7.6

Fair Story

Consider it well-founded

The article provides a comprehensive overview of Daniel Noboa's political journey, accurately covering his election victories and policies. It balances the narrative by presenting both his achievements and controversies, although it could include more diverse perspectives to enhance depth. The article is well-structured and timely, addressing issues of public interest such as crime and international relations. While the source quality is generally good, transparency could be improved by providing more detailed attributions and context. Overall, the article effectively informs readers about Noboa's presidency and the current political climate in Ecuador, though it could benefit from additional perspectives and deeper analysis of the implications of his policies.

Accuracy

The article accurately reports on Daniel Noboa's election victories and his background. It correctly states that Noboa won a snap election in 2023 and secured a four-year term in 2025, defeating Luisa González both times. The details about his age and family wealth are also correct, as is his political career starting in 2021. The claims about his crime-fighting strategies and their controversy are supported by facts. Noboa's efforts to align with the Trump administration and the police raid on Mexico's embassy are accurately depicted. The reported election results and González's allegations of fraud are consistent with verified sources.

Balance

The article provides a balanced view of Noboa's presidency by highlighting both his accomplishments and the controversies surrounding his crime-fighting strategies. It presents perspectives from both Noboa and his opponent, Luisa González, including her allegations of electoral fraud. The inclusion of expert opinions, such as Grace Jaramillo's insights on Noboa's relationship with the Trump administration, adds depth. However, the article could benefit from more perspectives from ordinary Ecuadorians to provide a fuller picture of public sentiment.

Clarity

The article is generally clear and well-structured, with a logical flow from Noboa's election background to his policies and controversies. The language is straightforward, making it accessible to a broad audience. However, some sections, such as the details of Noboa's crime-fighting strategies, could be more detailed to enhance comprehension.

Source quality

The article cites credible sources, including the National Electoral Council and political experts, to support its claims. However, it lacks direct quotes or detailed attributions for some of the more specific claims, such as the exact figures for the homicide rate changes. The reliance on unnamed sources for certain insights, like the nature of Noboa's feud with Vice President Abad, slightly diminishes the overall source quality.

Transparency

While the article provides a clear narrative of events, it lacks transparency in its sourcing methodology. The basis for some claims, such as the specific impact of Noboa's policies on crime rates, could be more explicitly linked to data or studies. The article does not disclose potential biases or conflicts of interest of the sources cited, which could affect readers' understanding of the context.