Coachella singer’s backflip fail ends in faceplant in front of massive crowd

New York Post - Apr 12th, 2025

During his first performance at Coachella, 20-year-old singer-songwriter d4vd, real name David Anthony Burke, attempted a backflip that ended in a face-plant on stage. The mishap, caught on a viral video, showed d4vd miscalculating his steps and falling with a loud thud, which was audible over the music. Despite the slip-up, d4vd quickly laughed it off and continued his set, executing several more acrobatic flips to regain momentum. He later shared the incident on social media, humorously dubbing it a 'humiliation ritual' and emphasizing his enjoyment of the set.

This incident highlights d4vd's resilience and flair for showmanship, as he turned a potential embarrassment into a memorable moment. His light-hearted approach on platforms like X and Instagram, where he referred to the event as 'clipfarming,' demonstrates his savvy use of social media to engage with fans. This performance at Coachella, a significant milestone for any artist, comes as d4vd prepares to release his second studio album, 'WITHERED,' later this month, marking an important step in his burgeoning music career.

Social Media Coachella Music Festival Viral Video D4vd Backflip Fail David Anthony Burke Withered Album

Story submitted by Fairstory

RATING

6.4

Moderately Fair

Read with skepticism

The article effectively captures a humorous incident at Coachella involving singer-songwriter d4vd, providing an engaging narrative supported by a viral video and social media posts. While the story is timely and well-written, it lacks depth in terms of source diversity and broader context. The focus on d4vd's perspective limits balance, and the absence of authoritative sources affects the credibility of the reporting. Despite these limitations, the article is clear, readable, and likely to engage audiences interested in pop culture and music festivals. However, its impact and public interest are limited, as it does not address significant societal issues or provoke substantial controversy.

Accuracy

The article accurately describes an incident involving singer-songwriter d4vd at Coachella, where he attempted a backflip and fell. The claim is supported by a viral video, which is mentioned multiple times in the text. The details about the incident, such as the sound of the thud and the singer's reaction, are vivid and specific, suggesting they are based on observable evidence. However, the article does not provide any direct quotes from witnesses or event organizers to further substantiate the claims.

The article also mentions d4vd's social media activity following the incident, quoting his posts verbatim. This information is likely accurate, given that social media posts can be easily verified. However, the statement that d4vd could not be reached for comment leaves a gap in the factual completeness of the story, as it lacks direct input from the subject of the article.

Overall, the article's core claims about the incident and the singer's response appear to be accurate, but the lack of additional corroborating sources and the absence of direct commentary from d4vd himself slightly undermine its verifiability.

Balance

The article primarily focuses on the incident involving d4vd and his subsequent social media response. It does not delve into other perspectives or broader implications of the event. The story is centered on d4vd's actions and reactions, which may suggest a slight bias towards portraying him in a humorous and resilient light.

There is no exploration of the audience's reaction beyond the mention of a viral video, nor is there any commentary from festival organizers or other performers. This lack of additional viewpoints limits the article's balance, as it does not provide a comprehensive view of the incident's impact or significance.

While the article does not explicitly favor one perspective over another, its narrow focus on d4vd's experience and response means it lacks a broader context that could offer a more balanced perspective.

Clarity

The article is written in clear and engaging language, making it easy for readers to understand the sequence of events. The use of vivid descriptions, such as the "sound of the thud" and the "sweat stain on the black stage," helps paint a clear picture of the incident.

The structure of the article is logical, starting with the incident itself, followed by d4vd's reaction and social media posts. This organization helps maintain a coherent narrative flow, allowing readers to follow the story without confusion.

The tone is lighthearted and somewhat humorous, which fits the nature of the story but may not be suitable for more serious news topics. Overall, the article is well-written and accessible, with only minor issues in clarity.

Source quality

The primary sources for the article appear to be the viral video of the incident and d4vd's social media posts. While these sources are relevant and directly related to the event, they are limited in scope and do not provide a comprehensive view of the situation.

The article does not cite any additional sources, such as eyewitness accounts, statements from Coachella organizers, or expert opinions on performance safety. The reliance on social media posts and a viral video without further corroboration from independent sources affects the overall credibility and reliability of the reporting.

The absence of diverse sources and the lack of attribution to any authoritative figures or organizations limit the article's source quality, as it relies heavily on self-published content from the subject of the story.

Transparency

The article is transparent in its use of sources, clearly indicating that the information is derived from a viral video and d4vd's social media posts. It does not, however, provide any methodology or context for how the incident was verified, such as attempts to contact eyewitnesses or festival organizers.

There is a lack of disclosure regarding any potential conflicts of interest, such as whether the publication has any affiliations with d4vd or Coachella. This omission could impact the perceived impartiality of the reporting.

While the article is straightforward about where its information comes from, the lack of deeper context and explanation of the verification process limits its transparency.